“…However, most recent methods use local features, because the local features are less sensitive to occlusions and other types of partially missing observations. Some examples are the wavelet descriptors in Schneiderman and Kanade (2000), the Haar like features in Viola and Jones (2001), the sparse rectangle features in Huang et al (2006Huang et al ( , 2007, the SIFT like orientation features in Mikolajczyk et al (2004), the Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) descriptors in Dalal and Triggs (2005), the code-book of local appearance in Leibe et al (2004Leibe et al ( , 2005, the boundary fragments in Opelt et al (2006), the biologically-motivated sparse, localized features in Mutch and Lowe (2006), the shapelet features in Sabzmeydani and Mori (2007), the covariance descriptors in Tuzel et al (2007), the motion enhanced Haar features in Viola et al (2003), the Internal Motion Histograms (IMH) in Dalal et al (2006), and the edgelet features used in our previous work Nevatia 2005, 2007c). The above features are mostly shape oriented, because shape is the most consistent and salient image cue for many object classes.…”