1973
DOI: 10.1148/108.3.567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Coronary Artery Size During Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sexspecific influence on coronary artery size, in turn, provides a possible explanation for the sex differences in coronary outcomes. Our findings are in agreement with results obtained from previous studies on coronary arterial dimensions (Roberts & Roberts;MacAlpin et al;Kornowski et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sexspecific influence on coronary artery size, in turn, provides a possible explanation for the sex differences in coronary outcomes. Our findings are in agreement with results obtained from previous studies on coronary arterial dimensions (Roberts & Roberts;MacAlpin et al;Kornowski et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several methods, such as, angiography, autopsy studies, intravascular ultrasound, have been occupied by various investigators to study the potential relation between the coronary artery dimensions and sex differences in prognosis of the coronary artery disease (Dodge et al, 1992;Roberts & Roberts, 1980;MacAlpin et al, 1973). However, it remains unclear whether sex differences in arterial dimensions simply reflect the effects of differences in body size or whether they are true sex-specific traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that age, body weight gender, genetics, and ethnicity play a role in this difference. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In this study, we preferred using a tabular format to compare our study with earlier studies that employed a similar working methodology ( Table 3). Our study results were comparable to those of the studies conducted in the Iraqi population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeina et al (10) reported LMCA cross-sectional area as smaller in women compared with men. In a small group of patients made up of 19 men and seven women MacAlpin et al (12) found no significant difference in normal coronary artery cross-sectional areas between genders. In our study, we found LMCA and LAD cross-sectional areas to be significantly larger in men compared with women (P < 0.001), while no significant difference was detected between genders with regard to CX cross-sectional areas (P = 0.094).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We believe that this difference might be attributed to patient demographics. While some studies reporting differences between female and male coronary artery cross-sectional areas are available, studies reporting the opposite are also found in the literature (10,12,13). Zeina et al (10) reported LMCA cross-sectional area as smaller in women compared with men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%