2006
DOI: 10.1162/154247606776014686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Capital in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make?

Abstract: We construct a revised version of the Barro and Lee (1996) data set for a sample of OECD countries using previously unexploited sources and following a heuristic approach to obtain plausible time profiles for attainment levels by removing sharp breaks in the data that seem to reflect changes in classification criteria. It is then shown that these revised data perform much better than the Barro and Lee (1996) or Nehru et al (1995) series in a number of growth specifications. We interpret these results as an ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
215
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
215
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we find that the augmented neoclassical model -the Mankiw, Romer and Weil (1992) version -is well suited to describe European growth. In establishing this result, we make use of the new data on human capital constructed by De la Fuente and Dome´nech (2000). 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we find that the augmented neoclassical model -the Mankiw, Romer and Weil (1992) version -is well suited to describe European growth. In establishing this result, we make use of the new data on human capital constructed by De la Fuente and Dome´nech (2000). 5.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dataset combine information from de la Fuente and Doménech (2006) with the OECD Education at the Glance database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, using the recent empirical study by de la Fuente and Doménech (2006), we argue that a plausible value for the intergenerational externality parameter, φ, lies between 0.27 and 0.40, i.e. nowhere in the vicinity of the knife-edge case considered by Boucekkine et al (2002) and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%