2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It stands out the production and collaboration in psychology in North America, and highlights the high levels of participation within (inbred) versus an interest in some countries (Asia) to cooperate, for different reasons, with the United States of America, due to the prestige derived from this collaboration (Porac et al, 2004). Additionally and related to the cooperation interest with economic powers of North America, would be related explanations that favor scientific collaboration and associates it with economic power between countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It stands out the production and collaboration in psychology in North America, and highlights the high levels of participation within (inbred) versus an interest in some countries (Asia) to cooperate, for different reasons, with the United States of America, due to the prestige derived from this collaboration (Porac et al, 2004). Additionally and related to the cooperation interest with economic powers of North America, would be related explanations that favor scientific collaboration and associates it with economic power between countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They additionally cite the increase of economic incentive for collaborative work (García-Martínez, Guerrero-Bote, & Moya-Anegón, 2012;Kliegl & Bates, 2010;Romero-Torres, Acosta-Moreno, & TejadaGómez, 2013). It is thus clear that increasing opportunities for collaboration may increase incentives for collaboration, and thus increase scientific output (Easterbrook, 1993;Johnson, 2009;Porac et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the likelihood that a pair of scientists will start collaborating depends on the number of common collaborators they have [14]. Future cooperation will be easier for scientists who come from the networks with similar views that overlap intellectually, although this would partly limit the breadth of knowledge within the network [18]. DeFazio et al [17] analysed the impact of funding on the relationships within the collaborative networks and scientific productivity, on a sample of 296 researchers who participated in research networks within the EU funded projects from the Fourth Framework Programme.…”
Section: Obstacles To Development Of Scientific Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…670-688, Jul./Ago. 2011 www.anpad.org.br/rac realmente inovador para além do incremental, ao confinar as informações àquelas redundantes -no reconhecido trade-off entre compartilhamento de conhecimento e variedade, estudado por Porac et al (2004).…”
Section: Redes Colaborativas De Pesquisaunclassified