2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

26
118
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
26
118
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the present experiments do not use a classical N400 paradigm, our early effect may be related to an N400-like priming effect, given its timing and its scalp-distribution. Similar effects, with relatively more positive amplitudes for repeated relative to non-repeated items, have been observed in longterm repetition priming experiments using famous names and faces (Schweinberger et al, 2002). The effect in Experiments 1 and 2 may resemble within-modality long-term repetition priming, as names repeated in the same stimulus modality between learning and test elicited more positive amplitudes than non-repeated new names and names presented in a different modality at test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the present experiments do not use a classical N400 paradigm, our early effect may be related to an N400-like priming effect, given its timing and its scalp-distribution. Similar effects, with relatively more positive amplitudes for repeated relative to non-repeated items, have been observed in longterm repetition priming experiments using famous names and faces (Schweinberger et al, 2002). The effect in Experiments 1 and 2 may resemble within-modality long-term repetition priming, as names repeated in the same stimulus modality between learning and test elicited more positive amplitudes than non-repeated new names and names presented in a different modality at test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Roediger & Blaxton, 1987), but in contrast to cross-modality priming in both younger and older adults for ecologically valid stimuli presented in the visual and auditory, as well as in the visual and tactual modality (Ballesteros, Gonzáles, Mayas, García-Rodríguez & Reales, 2009, Reales & Ballesteros, 1999. In an ERP study, repeated relative to nonrepeated names elicited more positive amplitudes between 500 -600 ms (Schweinberger, Pickering, Burton, & Kaufmann, 2002), resembling an N400 effect (Kutas & Federmeier, 2011), which was interpreted as reflecting the facilitated access to person-specific representations. Accordingly, an influence of repetition priming on source memory judgments for person-related information may manifest in N400-like ERP effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…More impor- However, lateralization of N170 revealed by this approach alone is questionable, because it is based on an oversimplified assumption that the two hemispheres are anatomically symmetrical. Taking face perception as an example, numerous neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have provided convincing evidence that face perceptual processes are strongly right-lateralized [23][24][25][26] , and some studies did show a larger N170 in the right hemisphere than in the left hemisphere [2] ; still, many studies also reported the N170 to faces to be bilateral [27][28][29] . We therefore took an alternative approach -to carefully compare the N170 in response to characters with other control stimuli within each hemisphere, which does not rely on the above assumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the procedure in that experiment involved presenting a prime immediately before a target. In studies using a study test procedure with delayed second item presentations, priming was not found for famous names this early in the ERP waveforms [17].…”
Section: P200 Effectmentioning
confidence: 94%