2022
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2098831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Borna disease virus 1 encephalitis shows marked pro-inflammatory biomarker and tissue immunoactivation during the course of disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BoDV-1 replicates within the cell nucleus and leads to persistent infections [ 8 ]. In spill-over hosts, severe clinical symptoms are attributed to an immunopathology, driven by a dysregulated inflammation and a presumably T-cell-mediated tissue destruction [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. After initial unspecific symptoms, the clinical course of the disease is characterized by a rapid onset of severe neurological symptoms including memory loss, seizures, apnea, and deep coma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BoDV-1 replicates within the cell nucleus and leads to persistent infections [ 8 ]. In spill-over hosts, severe clinical symptoms are attributed to an immunopathology, driven by a dysregulated inflammation and a presumably T-cell-mediated tissue destruction [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. After initial unspecific symptoms, the clinical course of the disease is characterized by a rapid onset of severe neurological symptoms including memory loss, seizures, apnea, and deep coma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IgG seroconversion occurs late during the course of the disease when severe neurological symptoms are already present [ 7 ]. Given the T-cell pathology of Borna disease and the previously described elevation of IFN-γ in the serum and CSF of patients with this infection [ 14 ], we addressed the question of whether an IFN-γ-based ELISpot is suitable in diagnosing patients with BoDV-1 infections. As we previously measured the serological responses against BoDV-1 N, X, and P protein by an ELISA system, we utilized 15-mer peptides covering these proteins for the stimulation of isolated PBMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T cells are present in virus-infected brain regions of BoDV-1 patients, with CD4 positive cells outnumbering CD8 positive cells [ 12 ]. In addition, an elevation of pro-inflammatory markers such as IFN-γ, IL-6, and chemokines (CCL-2, CCL-5, CXCL-10, IL-8) has been described in the serum and CSF of patients suffering from BoDV-1 infection [ 14 ]. As for tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus infections, the detection of pathogen-specific T cells is already exploited for diagnostic tests [ 15 ], we addressed the question of whether BoDV-1 infections can be diagnosed using a modified IFN-γ-based ELISpot with overlapping peptide pools of three BoDV-1-specific proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main hypothesis is that infections occur via uptake of contaminated viruscontaining particles via the olfactory route [11]. Studies indicate that the virus replicates rst in neurons and then in astrocytes, but not microglia [14]. The virus induces an increasing pro-in ammatory immune activation during BoDV-1 encephalitis [14], either as part of the host´s normal immune reaction or as a dysbalanced pro-in ammatory state, with lymphocytic-mediated (preferably CD8+) degeneration of the brain [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies indicate that the virus replicates rst in neurons and then in astrocytes, but not microglia [14]. The virus induces an increasing pro-in ammatory immune activation during BoDV-1 encephalitis [14], either as part of the host´s normal immune reaction or as a dysbalanced pro-in ammatory state, with lymphocytic-mediated (preferably CD8+) degeneration of the brain [15]. Previous single reports on a theoretical BoDV-1 involvement for psychiatric symptoms in non-symptomatic carriers [16,17] should be interpreted very cautiously, as they were not independently validated, failed in interlaboratory comparisons or could be the result of result of a laboratory contamination [13,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%