2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/746509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Antibody Response toAedes albopictusSalivary Proteins: A Potential Biomarker to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vector Control in an Area of Chikungunya and Dengue Virus Transmission

Abstract: Aedes borne viruses represent public health problems in southern countries and threat to emerge in the developed world. Their control is currently based on vector population control. Much effort is being devoted to develop new tools to control such arbovirus. Recent findings suggest that the evaluation of human antibody (Ab) response to arthropod salivary proteins is relevant to measuring the level of human exposure to mosquito bites. Using an immunoepidemiological approach, the present study aimed to assess t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the measure of the IgG response helped in assessing the efficacy of control strategies based on deltamethrin spray and physical elimination of breeding sites two weeks after the implementation of these control measures. This result is particularly important for the relevancy of SBs in that no significant decrease of the Breteau index (BI) and adult density was observed using the standard entomological techniques [ 39 ]. These studies show that the SB is a pertinent tool for assessing the efficacy of different vector control strategies over a short period.…”
Section: Mosquito Salivary Biomarkers For Monitoring Vector Contromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the measure of the IgG response helped in assessing the efficacy of control strategies based on deltamethrin spray and physical elimination of breeding sites two weeks after the implementation of these control measures. This result is particularly important for the relevancy of SBs in that no significant decrease of the Breteau index (BI) and adult density was observed using the standard entomological techniques [ 39 ]. These studies show that the SB is a pertinent tool for assessing the efficacy of different vector control strategies over a short period.…”
Section: Mosquito Salivary Biomarkers For Monitoring Vector Contromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the type and concentration of antibodies against vector salivary gland extract (SGE) can serve as markers for disease transmission and risk (7)(8)(9)(10) and to evaluate the efficacy of vector control efforts (11,12). Additionally, estimating the prevalence of antibodies against all DENV serotypes that have circulated in a specific area gives insight of the population exposure to the virus (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding Aedes mosquitoes, several studies in Finnish Lapland [ 25 ], Canada [ 38 ], Senegal [ 17 ], Bolivia and Reunion Island [ 23 , 39 ], have reported an increasing anti-saliva IgG Ab during the peak of human exposure or in persons living in sites with higher Aedes density. Anti-saliva IgG responses have shown to potentially wane just 15 days after a decrease in Aedes albopictus densities [ 40 ]. Other studies performed in domestic animals showed that IgM antibodies against the saliva of triatomine bugs can be detected after one day of exposure and waned rapidly (18 days) [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Development Of Antibody-based Biomarker Of Exposure To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea was that the level of specific Ab of an individual is proportional, as a proxy, to the intensity of mosquito bites received by the individual ( Figure 2 ). For example, it has been shown that an individual slightly exposed to Aedes bites thus produces a low-level Ab response (≤0.70 ΔOD) to Aedes salivary antigens, while a highly-exposed individual to Aedes bites produces a high-level Ab response (≥1.2 ΔOD) to Aedes salivary antigens [ 40 ]. The advantage of such a tool is that it is quantitative (values are expressed in optical densities (OD)) and individual (one OD value represents the level of exposure to bites of one individual).…”
Section: Development Of Antibody-based Biomarker Of Exposure To mentioning
confidence: 99%