Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2559636.2563717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human and robot interaction based on safety zones in a shared work environment

Abstract: In this paper, early work on how to implement flexible safety zones is presented. In the case study an industrial robot cell emulates the environment at a wall construction site, with a robot performing nailing routines. Tests are performed with humans entering the safety zones of a SafetyEye system. The zone violation is detected, and new warning zones initiated. The robot retracts but continues its work tasks with reduced speed and within a safe distance of the human operator. Interaction is achieved through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system, designed in accordance with relevant norms and safety standards, allows the design of fenceless robotic cells. Augustsson et al [14] presented a work using a safetyEYE to define flexible safety zones in shared working environments, reducing the robot speed and maintaining a safe distance to the human operator during the robot carries out nailing routines. Even so there are some drawbacks in the safetyEYE as this system only provides discrete information about the state of the robotic cell (safe, warning or alarm) and it cannot 1 http://www.xact-project.eu/.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system, designed in accordance with relevant norms and safety standards, allows the design of fenceless robotic cells. Augustsson et al [14] presented a work using a safetyEYE to define flexible safety zones in shared working environments, reducing the robot speed and maintaining a safe distance to the human operator during the robot carries out nailing routines. Even so there are some drawbacks in the safetyEYE as this system only provides discrete information about the state of the robotic cell (safe, warning or alarm) and it cannot 1 http://www.xact-project.eu/.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of cooperation has been tested in industry and works quite well, the problem lies in too much idle time for the robot. To try to avoid idle time and to create a situation where the human and robot can coproduce products and not just co-exist in the cell we have suggested in [3] a flexible zone system with adjustable safety zones with the ability to activate and deactivate zone arrangements in a dynamic way. The safety zones can also be grouped and assigned with different severity levels to control the interaction.…”
Section: Tracking the Human Through Safety Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. New zones are initiated and monitored (see (3) in Figure 3) 5. The operator now performs tasks in the first section.…”
Section: Tracking the Human Through Safety Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, however, the safety is a great concern. Several approaches has been studied including a 3D camera, Pilz SafetyEye [19]. However, it has been found feasible to use different approaches in combinations based on the specific design and need for the work process and robot system, and a combination of camera based techniques which include sectioning using laser scanners, and hand held devices which activate the collaborating robot has been tried out.…”
Section: Planning and Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%