2018 15th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/indicon45594.2018.8987001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Biomedical Sensors in Cyber Physical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have also analyzed the use of a set of pressure sensors placed in a shoe insole [19] or integrated into an armband, to detect upper limb movements [22]. In turn physiological variables, such as muscular activity [14], breathing [35,37], and heart rate [21,32,36], have also demonstrated their effectiveness in measuring the intensity of the activity and improving the detection of human activity in general. Many commercial wearables use heart rate (HR) based on a photoplethysmography (PPG) circuit embedded in a smartwatch [41], which helps keep HR under a maximum limit during PA and is especially useful for people who have suffered heart failure [6].…”
Section: Ref #Activities Devices and Placement Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies have also analyzed the use of a set of pressure sensors placed in a shoe insole [19] or integrated into an armband, to detect upper limb movements [22]. In turn physiological variables, such as muscular activity [14], breathing [35,37], and heart rate [21,32,36], have also demonstrated their effectiveness in measuring the intensity of the activity and improving the detection of human activity in general. Many commercial wearables use heart rate (HR) based on a photoplethysmography (PPG) circuit embedded in a smartwatch [41], which helps keep HR under a maximum limit during PA and is especially useful for people who have suffered heart failure [6].…”
Section: Ref #Activities Devices and Placement Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, various methods from the field of signal processing have been leveraged to distill collected sensor data. These have included k-NN [14,30,33,35], random forest (RF), decision tree (DT) [20,38], gaussian mixture model (GMM) and hidden Markov models (HMM) [16,24] or even models based exclusively on thresholds [29] ], all of which requires domain-specific expert knowledge to process raw data. Feature engineering is required to fit a model and this is expensive and not scalable.…”
Section: Ref #Activities Devices and Placement Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of the model is not high, and the hardware cost is expensive. The authors [2] proposed wearable biomedical sensors to recognize human activities. They used three classifiers (kNN, linear, and Gaussian kernels) for the training and testing phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%