2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.6614027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human activity recognition on raw sensor data via sparse approximation

Abstract: Dans cet article, nous proposons une approche pour reconnaitre certaines activités physiques en utilisant un réseau d'objets connectés. L'approche consiste à classer certaines activités humaines : marcher, debout, assis et allonger. Cette étude utilise un réseau d'objets connectés usuels: une montre connectée, un smartphone et une télécommande connectée. Ces objets sont portés par les participants lors d'une expérience non contrôlée. Les données des capteurs des trois dispositifs ont été classées par un algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitive control can be developed by extracting the user's intention from signals recorded in a non-invasive way [through surface EMG electrodes (sEMG; Dohnalek et al, 2013 ), ultrasound imaging (Gonzales and Castellini, 2013 ), force myography (FMG; Wininger et al, 2008 )] or else in an invasive way [by means of Implantable Myoelectric Sensors (IMES; Pasquina et al, 2015 ), neural interfaces (Dhillon et al, 2004 )] from the Peripheral or Central Nervous System. Invasive surgical procedures, such as Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR), have been applied in some cases of very proximal limb loss to allow an intuitive prosthesis control through myoelectric interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intuitive control can be developed by extracting the user's intention from signals recorded in a non-invasive way [through surface EMG electrodes (sEMG; Dohnalek et al, 2013 ), ultrasound imaging (Gonzales and Castellini, 2013 ), force myography (FMG; Wininger et al, 2008 )] or else in an invasive way [by means of Implantable Myoelectric Sensors (IMES; Pasquina et al, 2015 ), neural interfaces (Dhillon et al, 2004 )] from the Peripheral or Central Nervous System. Invasive surgical procedures, such as Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR), have been applied in some cases of very proximal limb loss to allow an intuitive prosthesis control through myoelectric interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these limitations, several approaches have been proposed, such as ultrasound imaging (Gonzales and Castellini, 2013 ), FMG (Wininger et al, 2008 ), TMR (Hijjawi et al, 2006 ; Miller et al, 2008 ), pattern recognition techniques (Cloutier and Yang, 2013 ) applied to EMG signals acquired through implantable (IMES; Pasquina et al, 2015 ) or surface electrodes (Dohnalek et al, 2013 ), and neural signals acquired through implantable neural interfaces (Dhillon et al, 2004 ; Polasek et al, 2009 ; Rossini et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaled “raw” sEMG data were directly used as input for the NLR model, without performing any features extraction. The use of only “raw” sEMG signals allowed a significant reduction of the classification time and of the response time without loss of system performance (Nazarpour, 2005; Dohnalek et al, 2013; Benatti et al, 2014). Moreover, the use of “raw” scaled sEMG signals (Figure 3) as input features approximated the class evaluation time and system readiness to the sampling time (Bellingegni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hargrove et al ( 2007 ) the effects of the choice of feature sets over classifier performance are in-depth investigated. Moreover, methods based on “raw” filtered EMG signals have been recently proposed; they allow considerably decreasing the time for feature extraction and skipping the feature reduction step without significant loss of system performance (Nazarpour, 2005 ; Dohnalek et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Prosthetic Hand Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%