Human Activities on the Deep Seafloor in the North East Atlantic: An Assessment of Spatial Extent

Abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental impacts of human activities on the deep seafloor are of increasing concern. While activities within waters shallower than 200 m have been the focus of previous assessments of anthropogenic impacts, no study has quantified the extent of individual activities or determined the relative severity of each type of impact in the deep sea.MethodologyThe OSPAR maritime area of the North East Atlantic was chosen for the study because it is considered to be one of the most heavily impacted by human activities. In addition, it was assumed data would be accessible and comprehensive. Using the available data we map and estimate the spatial extent of five major human activities in the North East Atlantic that impact the deep seafloor: submarine communication cables, marine scientific research, oil and gas industry, bottom trawling and the historical dumping of radioactive waste, munitions and chemical weapons. It was not possible to map military activities. The extent of each activity has been quantified for a single year, 2005.Principal FindingsHuman activities on the deep seafloor of the OSPAR area of the North Atlantic are significant but their footprints vary. Some activities have an immediate impact after which seafloor communities could re-establish, while others can continue to make an impact for many years and the impact could extend far beyond the physical disturbance. The spatial extent of waste disposal, telecommunication cables, the hydrocarbon industry and marine research activities is relatively small. The extent of bottom trawling is very significant and, even on the lowest possible estimates, is an order of magnitude greater than the total extent of all the other activities.Conclusions/SignificanceTo meet future ecosystem-based management and governance objectives for the deep sea significant improvements are required in data collection and availability as well as a greater awareness of the relative impact of each human activity.

Twenty thousand sterling under the sea: Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity

“…To be able to value these changes, it is crucial to understand the threats to the marine ecosystem and their effects on biodiversity. Scientists agree that despite its remoteness, the deep-sea is far from being unaffected by human activity and wide-spread changes are already noticeable today (Benn et al, 2010;Fosså et al, 2002;Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011;Van den Hove et al, 2007). Climate change, which is resulting in increasing ocean surface temperatures and ocean acidification, is thought to be the biggest future challenge for the deep-sea ecosystem (Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011).…”

“…Climate change, which is resulting in increasing ocean surface temperatures and ocean acidification, is thought to be the biggest future challenge for the deep-sea ecosystem (Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011). The most immediate threats however, are related to the fishing sector, oil and gas exploitation, cable laying, pipeline construction, underwater noise and water pollution from shipping routes, waste dumping, drill cuttings from mining activities, and pollution from terrestrial sources (Armstrong et al, 2010(Armstrong et al, & 2012Benn et al, 2010;Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011). Whereas the environmental impact of mining on the seabed is still unknown, deep-sea fishing has been identified as having a major impact (Benn et al, 2010).…”

“…The most immediate threats however, are related to the fishing sector, oil and gas exploitation, cable laying, pipeline construction, underwater noise and water pollution from shipping routes, waste dumping, drill cuttings from mining activities, and pollution from terrestrial sources (Armstrong et al, 2010(Armstrong et al, & 2012Benn et al, 2010;Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011). Whereas the environmental impact of mining on the seabed is still unknown, deep-sea fishing has been identified as having a major impact (Benn et al, 2010). Fisheries have targeted ever deeper fish stocks since the 1950s, even though deep-sea species are particularly vulnerable to overexploitation, due to their slow growth and late maturity (Morato et al, 2006).…”

Economic Valuation of Marine and Coastal Ecosystems: Is it currently fit for purpose?

“…It accounts for nearly 91% of the world's ocean surface, but is being affected by anthropogenic impacts such as increasing acidification and rising temperatures, pollution, exploitation of fish, and extraction of minerals and hydrocarbon resources (Benn et al, 2010;Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011). To date, scientists still know relatively little about the deep sea and "safe limits" for resource exploitation are either unknown or very uncertain.…”

Deep-sea genetic resources: New frontiers for science and stewardship in areas beyond national jurisdiction

“…4 A new ILBI could address gaps and fragmentation in the existing international legal framework Gjerde, 2014, Warner, 2014). This is a critical step for deep-sea stewardship 5 that could facilitate international cooperation for sustainable management (Rochette et al, 2015, Warner, 2014 and promote new action needed to address the numerous and growing threats to deep-sea biodiversity (Benn et al, 2010, Halpern et al, 2008, Van Dover, 2014 in ABNJ. MGR are a complex and highly contentious issue for the negotiations for a new ILBI, which will also consider: area-based management tools, including marine protected areas; environmental impact assessments; and capacity building and the transfer of marine technology.…”