1968
DOI: 10.2527/jas1968.274981x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hulless Barley in Diets for Weanling Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another experiment also found that growth performance was not different for growing pigs fed diets that contained hulled or hull-less barley when the diets were made isocaloric (DE/kg) with added fat (Harper et al, 2004). However, in different experiments where the diets with hulled or hull-less barley were not made isocaloric with fat, weanling and growing pigs fed the diets that contained hull-less barley had greater growth performance (Gill et al, 1966;Newman et al, 1968;Thacker et al, 1988) and greater energy digestibility (Mitchall et al, 1976;Bhatty et al, 1979) than pigs fed the diets that contained hulled barley because of the greater DE per kilogram in hull-less barley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another experiment also found that growth performance was not different for growing pigs fed diets that contained hulled or hull-less barley when the diets were made isocaloric (DE/kg) with added fat (Harper et al, 2004). However, in different experiments where the diets with hulled or hull-less barley were not made isocaloric with fat, weanling and growing pigs fed the diets that contained hull-less barley had greater growth performance (Gill et al, 1966;Newman et al, 1968;Thacker et al, 1988) and greater energy digestibility (Mitchall et al, 1976;Bhatty et al, 1979) than pigs fed the diets that contained hulled barley because of the greater DE per kilogram in hull-less barley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The genetic removal of hulls from barley and the production of hull-less varieties has been shown to effectively improve the feeding value of barley. Most hull-less varieties are superior to isogenic hulled varieties for growing-finishing and finishing swine (Joseph 1924;Gill et al 1966;Newman et al 1968;Newman and Eslick 1970;Newman et al 1980). Hull-less barley contains more digestible energy than its hulled counterpart, 3295 vs. 3133 kcallkg (Mitchell et al 1976) and 3398 vs 2962 kcallkg (Bhatty et al 1979).…”
Section: Barleymentioning
confidence: 99%