Hubungan Stigma Gangguan Jiwa dengan Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Orang dengan Gangguan Jiwa di Wilayah Kerja  Puskesmas Karya Wanita Pekanbaru

Usraleli, Usraleli; Fitriana, Dedek; Magdalena, Magdalena; Melly, Melly; Idayanti, Idayanti

doi:10.33087/jiubj.v20i2.940

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, stigma consciousness can be defined as an individual's judgment that arises from ignorance and a mistaken understanding of other groups (Syafriani & Fitriani, 2020). This consciousness can arise from norms that are believed and categorized within the structure of society (Usraleli et al, 2020). Individuals who internalize certain stigmas tend to reject and discriminate against other groups (Lubis et al, 2016;Usraleli et al, 2020).…”

Section: Other Indicators Of High-quality Friendship Include Supporti...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This consciousness can arise from norms that are believed and categorized within the structure of society (Usraleli et al, 2020). Individuals who internalize certain stigmas tend to reject and discriminate against other groups (Lubis et al, 2016;Usraleli et al, 2020). The stigma consciousness regarding interfaith friendships that develop in society can cause individuals to worry about problems that may arise before and during the establishment of such friendships.…”

Section: Other Indicators Of High-quality Friendship Include Supporti...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interfaith friendships among emerging adulthood in Surabaya: The role of tolerance and stigma consciousness

Fonda,

Muttaqin

2023

Humanitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forming quality interfaith friendships is not impossible. Additionally, our society has become accustomed to differences. However, a clear explanation for the difficulty of forming such friendships has yet to be established. This study aimed to investigate the influence of tolerance and stigma consciousness on the quality of interfaith friendships. The research involved 400 respondents aged 18-25, comprising 200 Muslim respondents with at least one non-Muslim friend and 200 non-Muslim respondents with at least one Muslim friend. The quality of friendship was evaluated using the McGill Friendship Questionnaire (MFQ), while tolerance and stigma consciousness were measured using the Tolerance Index Questionnaire (TI) and Stigma Consciousness Questionnaire (SCQ), respectively. Multiple regression analysis was utilized to test the research hypothesis. The study results indicate that tolerance and stigma consciousness are significant factors in determining the quality of interfaith friendships. Individuals with tolerance and low levels of stigma consciousness are more likely to form quality interfaith friendships.

show abstract

Section: Other Indicators Of High-quality Friendship Include Supporti...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Other Indicators Of High-quality Friendship Include Supporti...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interfaith friendships among emerging adulthood in Surabaya: The role of tolerance and stigma consciousness

Fonda,

Muttaqin

2023

Humanitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ketika seorang individu mengalami kesehatan mental yang buruk, maka akan merasakan kecemasan yang luar biasa dan sulit untuk mengendalikan diri, banyak faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi kesehatan mental seseorang 31 . Gangguan emosi merupakan pengalaman yang dilakukan secara sadar dan dapat memberikan pengaruh pada aktivitasnya 32 . Emosi yang sudah tidak dapat dikontrol sangat berpengaruh terhadap aktivitas yang menyebabkan seorang individu tidak dapat berfikir secara positif, dan perilaku akan menjadi tidak terkontrol 33 .…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Hubungan antara Kesehatan Lingkungan dengan Gangguan Emosional

Sukesi,

Sulistyawati,

Khair

et al. 2023

Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Latar Belakang : Gangguan kesehatan jiwa saat ini semakin meningkat di Indonesia khususnya di Yogyakarta. Berdasarkan hasil Riskesdas 2018, prevalensi rumah tangga di DIY yang melaporkan anggota rumah tangganya mengalami gangguan jiwa berat atau psikosis adalah 10,65 per 1000 rumah tangga. Data ini meningkat signifikan dibandingkan data Riskesdas tahun 2013 yang hanya 2,3 per 1000 rumah tangga. Jumlah kasus gangguan jiwa di DIY cukup jauh di atas angka nasional yaitu 7 dari 1000 rumah tangga. Kesehatan lingkungan dan sosial ekonomi merupakan salah satu faktor pemicu terjadinya gangguan jiwa. Kondisi lingkungan yang tidak sehat, kondisi sosial dan ekonomi yang rendah dapat memicu terjadinya gangguan kesehatan jiwa. Metode: Cross sectional merupakan metode yang digunakan, dengan teknik purposive sampling dan menggunakan uji chi-square. Kegiatan diawali dengan sosialisasi kepada mitra kemudian dilanjutkan dengan penelitian yang dilakukan pada tanggal 30 September hingga 17 Oktober 2022 dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 45 responden. Hasil: Distribusi frekuensi responden pada variabel gangguan emosi sebanyak 48,9%. Variabel pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar 68,9%, komponen rumah yang tidak terpenuhi 80%, fasilitas sanitasi sanitasi yang tidak terpenuhi 64,4%, perilaku penghuni yang tidak baik 46,7% dan rumah sehat tidak terpenuhi 53,3%. paling banyak, yaitu komponen. Hasil uji bivariat tidak terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara kondisi lingkungan dengan gangguan emosi. Hal ini ditunjukkan dengan nilai P lebih dari 0,05.Simpulan: Tidak ada hubungan antara gangguan emosi dengan kondisi lingkungan dan ekonomi ABSTRACT Title : Relationship Between Environmental Health and Emotional DisordersBackground : Mental health disorders are currently increasing in Indonesia, especially in Yogyakarta. Based on the results of Riskesdas 2018, the prevalence of households in DIY that reported their household members with severe mental disorders or psychosis was 10.65 per 1000 households. This data increased significantly compared to the data from Riskesdas in 2013 which was only 2.3 per 1000 households. The number of mental health cases in DIY is quite far above the national figure of 7 out of 1000 households. Environmental health and socioeconomic are one of the triggering factors for mental disorders. Unhealthy environmental conditions, low social and economic conditions can trigger mental health disorders. Methods: The method used is cross sectional with purposive sampling technique and using chi-square test. The activity began with outreach to partners and then continued with research conducted from September 30 to October 17, 2022 with a total sample of 45 respondents. Result: The frequency distribution of respondents to the emotional disturbance variable was 48.9%. Variable fulfillment of basic needs was 68.9%, housing components were not fulfilled 80%, sanitation facilities was not fulfilled 64.4%, occupant behavior was not good 46.7% and healthy homes was not fulfilled 53.3%. The bivariate test showed that there was no significant relationship between environmental conditions and emotional disturbances. This is indicated by a P value of more than 0.05.Conclusion: There was no relationship between emotional disorders with environmental and economic conditions

show abstract

“…Disamping itu, stigma negatif merupakan salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi penderita gangguan jiwa ditolak atau mendapat penerimaan yang kurang baik dari masyarakat (Mawaddah dkk, 2020) Munculnya berbagai stigma di masyarakat terkait orang dengan gangguan jiwa, yaitu masyarakat menganggap penderita gangguan jiwa dengan sebutan orang gila, takut dengan ODGJ, tidak mau bergaul dengannya maupun keluarganya, penderita gangguan jiwa seharusnya dimasukkan ke rumah sakit jiwa. Maka dari itu, diperlukannya kesadaran dari diri masyarakat sehingga masyarakat memiliki pengetahuan yang baik agar tercipta stigma yang positif terhadap penderita gangguan jiwa (Usrareli et al, 2020).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Hubungan Stigma Masyarakat Dengan Penerimaan Masyarakat Terhadap Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa

Yulita¹,

Nauli²,

Erwin³

2022

COPING

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public acceptance of people with mental disorders (ODGJ) functions for the recovery process and prevents recurrence of ODGJ in the community, community stigma is one of the factors that can affect people with mental disorders being rejected or accepted in the community. This study aimed to determine whether there is a relationship between community stigma and community acceptance of ODGJ. This study uses a descriptive correlation design and a cross sectional. The research sample was 99 respondents who were taken based on the inclusion criteria using cluster sampling technique which a respondent taken from representatives of each family head (KK) who lived in the same RT with ODGJ. The analysis used is bivariate analysis using chi-square. Of the 99 respondents, community stigma showed 52 respondents (52,5%) with low stigma category, and public acceptance showed 56 respondents (56,6%) with good acceptance category with p value 0,000. It can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between community stigma and public acceptance of ODGJ.

show abstract

Hubungan Stigma Gangguan Jiwa dengan Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Orang dengan Gangguan Jiwa di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Karya Wanita Pekanbaru

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Interfaith friendships among emerging adulthood in Surabaya: The role of tolerance and stigma consciousness

Interfaith friendships among emerging adulthood in Surabaya: The role of tolerance and stigma consciousness

Hubungan antara Kesehatan Lingkungan dengan Gangguan Emosional

Hubungan Stigma Masyarakat Dengan Penerimaan Masyarakat Terhadap Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About