2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.083529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hubble flow variance and the cosmic rest frame

Abstract: We characterize the radial and angular variance of the Hubble flow in the COMPOSITE sample of 4534 galaxies, on scales in which much of the flow is in the nonlinear regime. With no cosmological assumptions other than the existence of a suitably averaged linear Hubble law, we find with decisive Bayesian evidence (ln B >> 5) that the Hubble constant averaged in independent spherical radial shells is closer to its asymptotic value when referred to the rest frame of the Local Group, rather than the standard rest f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
138
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(277 reference statements)
11
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this result is completely unexpected if the clustering dipole is purely kinematic, the residual monopole and dipole variations of the Hubble expansion in the LG frame were found to be consistent with a 0.5% anisotropy in the distance-redshift relation on < ∼ 65 h −1 Mpc scales, 74 an effect which can be reproduced using nonlinear exact solutions of Einstein's equations with inhomogeneities no larger than the scales in question.…”
Section: Tests Of Spatial Geometry On "Small " Scalesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…While this result is completely unexpected if the clustering dipole is purely kinematic, the residual monopole and dipole variations of the Hubble expansion in the LG frame were found to be consistent with a 0.5% anisotropy in the distance-redshift relation on < ∼ 65 h −1 Mpc scales, 74 an effect which can be reproduced using nonlinear exact solutions of Einstein's equations with inhomogeneities no larger than the scales in question.…”
Section: Tests Of Spatial Geometry On "Small " Scalesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is known that anisotropies in the Hubble and deceleration parameters cannot be excluded by present observations [22], [23] and [24]. Consequently, perturbations of anisotropic cosmological models have been considered by many authors, e.g., [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], using both gauge dependent methods (e.g., [33]) or Bardeen's gauge invariant formalism [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dipole and quadrupole variations of the local Hubble expansion are then quantitatively compared to those of the COMPOSITE sample data as studied earlier in Ref. 74. It is found that the Szekeres model is able to more closely model observational features than either a FLRW model with kinematic boost from the LG to CMB frame, or Newtonian N -body simulations.…”
Section: Recent Observational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this result is completely unexpected if the clustering dipole is purely kinematic, the residual monopole and dipole variation of the Hubble expansion in the Local Group frame was found to be consistent with a 0.5% anisotropy in the distance-redshift relation on < ∼ 65 h −1 Mpc scales [74], an effect which can be reproduced using nonlinear exact solutions of Einstein's equations with inhomogeneities no larger than the scales in question [76].…”
Section: Observational Challenges For Flrwmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation