2019
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17149.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hub genes in a pan-cancer co-expression network show potential for predicting drug responses

Abstract: Background: The topological analysis of networks extracted from different types of “omics” data is a useful strategy for characterizing biologically meaningful properties of the complex systems underlying these networks. In particular, the biological significance of highly connected genes in diverse molecular networks has been previously determined using data from several model organisms and phenotypes. Despite such insights, the predictive potential of candidate hubs in gene co-expression networks in the spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from the original COXEN method and randomly selected genes, we also compared the enhanced COXEN method to a set of hub genes derived from co-expression network analysis that are predictive of drug response [ 24 ]. Azuaje et al performed a pan-cancer co-expression network analysis based on more than 1000 CCLs, and identified 47 genes as representing “hubs” in the network [ 24 ]. A total of 45 out of the 47 genes were included in the gene expression data used in our analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from the original COXEN method and randomly selected genes, we also compared the enhanced COXEN method to a set of hub genes derived from co-expression network analysis that are predictive of drug response [ 24 ]. Azuaje et al performed a pan-cancer co-expression network analysis based on more than 1000 CCLs, and identified 47 genes as representing “hubs” in the network [ 24 ]. A total of 45 out of the 47 genes were included in the gene expression data used in our analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Enhanced COXEN and Hub Genes refer to the enhanced COXEN method and the hub genes identified from co-expression network analysis [ 24 ], respectively. In the R 2 columns, the number before the parenthesis is the average R 2 across cross-validation trails and the number in the parenthesis is the standard deviation.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cancer cell lines with mutations in the BRAF genes are significantly more sensitive to PLX4730, a BRAF-inhibitor, than those with wild-type BRAF (Yang et al, 2013). Additional computational methods for predicting sensitivity to drugs using gene expression data from cancer cell lines have been developed, for example (Azuaje et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2016;Suphavilai et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2019). Several publications have recent efforts in this area (Azuaje, 2017;Guan et al, 2019;Guvenc Paltun et al, 2019;Reinhold et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cancer cell lines with mutations in the BRAF genes are significantly more sensitive to PLX4730, a BRAF-inhibitor, than those with wild-type BRAF [3]. Additional computational methods for predicting sensitivity to drugs using gene expression data from cancer cell lines have been developed, for example [11][12][13][14]. Several publications have recent efforts in this area [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%