http://openventio.org/Volume1_Issue1/The_Impact_of_VAP_Staff_Education_on_VAP_Morbidity_and_Mortality_in_Alexandria_University_PRRMOJ_1_105.pdf

Abstract

CitationElmenshawy AM, Elbadawy TH, Abu khaber H, Hafez SF, Fayed AM, Ibrahim EH. The impact of VAP staff education on VAP morbidity and mortality in Alexandria University. ResearchPage 32 ABSTRACT Background: Staff education had several success stories in reducing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) rate. However, the stability of supplies and the top management support were not addressed in most of these studies. In addition, both were considered essential in several reviews. Aim: To determine the efficiency (VAP rate) and efficacy (mechanical ventilation morbidity and mortality) of VAP staff education with deficient supplies and lack of top management support. Methods: Quasi-experimental study with before and after prospective cohort in two medical/ surgical ICUs of Alexandria university affiliated hospitals during the period from September 2007 till May 2013. The intervention phase included the provision of supplementary supplies, interactive education for physicians and nurses followed by a VAP campaign. All VAP episodes not only the first one was included. Results: A total of 598 patients were enrolled in the study. The adherence to expanded VAP bundle significantly increased in the post-intervention phase as follows; head of bed elevation (from mean of 40 to 100% with p=0.001), oral care (from mean of 20 to 100% with p=0.001), daily sedation vacation (from mean of 56.5 to 91% with p=0.001), daily assessment of weaning (from mean of 9 to 25% with p=0. 03), peptic ulcer prophylaxis (from mean of 83 to 100% with p=0.001), DVT prophylaxis (from mean of 82 to 100% and p=0.001), cuff pressure measurement (from mean of 9 to 60% with p=0.001), and hand hygiene (from mean of 8 to 28.5% with p=0.001).The VAP rate decreased significantly by 35% (from 66.5 to 43 per 1000 MV days) with p= 0.002 and CI 9.73-37.15 in spite of significant increase of the ventilator utilization ratio (p <0.001) in the post-intervention phase. The MV, antibiotic and ICU days did not change significantly in the post-intervention phase. The distribution of organisms did not differ significantly between both groups (p=0. 465). The sensitivity of most of carbapenems and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors to Acinetobacter, Klebsiella andPseudomonas decreased significantly in the post intervention phase whereas the sensitivity of vancomyicin to Staphylococcus aureus remained the same. Conclusions: In spite of the lack of top management support and fluctuating supplies, VAP staff education was still efficient in reducing VAP without affecting mortality or MV days or ICU length of stay.