Abstract:Primary cilia are hair-like projections of the cell membrane supported by an inner microtubule scaffold, the axoneme, which polymerizes out of a membrane-docked centriole at the ciliary base. By working as specialized signaling compartments, primary cilia provide an optimal environment for many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their effectors to efficiently transmit their signals to the rest of the cell. For this to occur, however, all necessary receptors and signal transducers must first accumulate at … Show more
“…In COPI, membrane-associated β-propeller domains interact with the dilysine motifs on cargoes destined for transport from the Golgi to the ER (Jackson et al, 2012; Ma and Goldberg, 2013). The sequence determinants for ciliary membrane protein targeting are less well defined, but can involve distributed, partially redundant motifs [for example, in the third intracellular loop and C-terminal region of ciliary GPCRs; (Barbeito and Garcia-Gonzalo, 2021)]. It is possible that the β-propellers of IFT-A and TUBBY domain of TULP work in conjunction to recognize different targeting elements on ciliary membrane proteins.…”
Intraflagellar transport (IFT) trains are molecular machines that traffic proteins between cilia and the cell body. With a molecular weight over 80 MDa, each IFT train is a dynamic polymer of two large complexes (IFT-A and -B) and motor proteins, posing a formidable challenge to mechanistic understanding. Here, we reconstituted the complete human IFT-A complex and obtained its structure using cryo-EM. Combined with AlphaFold prediction and genome-editing studies, our results illuminate how IFT-A polymerizes; interacts with IFT-B; and uses an array of beta-propeller and TPR domains to create "carriages" of the IFT train that engage TULP adaptor proteins. We show that IFT-A:TULP carriages are essential for cilia localization of diverse membrane proteins, as well as ICK - the key kinase regulating IFT train turnaround. These data establish a structural link between IFT-A's distinct functions, provide a blueprint for the IFT-A train, and shed light on how IFT evolved from a proto-coatomer ancestor.
“…In COPI, membrane-associated β-propeller domains interact with the dilysine motifs on cargoes destined for transport from the Golgi to the ER (Jackson et al, 2012; Ma and Goldberg, 2013). The sequence determinants for ciliary membrane protein targeting are less well defined, but can involve distributed, partially redundant motifs [for example, in the third intracellular loop and C-terminal region of ciliary GPCRs; (Barbeito and Garcia-Gonzalo, 2021)]. It is possible that the β-propellers of IFT-A and TUBBY domain of TULP work in conjunction to recognize different targeting elements on ciliary membrane proteins.…”
Intraflagellar transport (IFT) trains are molecular machines that traffic proteins between cilia and the cell body. With a molecular weight over 80 MDa, each IFT train is a dynamic polymer of two large complexes (IFT-A and -B) and motor proteins, posing a formidable challenge to mechanistic understanding. Here, we reconstituted the complete human IFT-A complex and obtained its structure using cryo-EM. Combined with AlphaFold prediction and genome-editing studies, our results illuminate how IFT-A polymerizes; interacts with IFT-B; and uses an array of beta-propeller and TPR domains to create "carriages" of the IFT train that engage TULP adaptor proteins. We show that IFT-A:TULP carriages are essential for cilia localization of diverse membrane proteins, as well as ICK - the key kinase regulating IFT train turnaround. These data establish a structural link between IFT-A's distinct functions, provide a blueprint for the IFT-A train, and shed light on how IFT evolved from a proto-coatomer ancestor.
“…On the other hand, CLS4 is needed for association to PDE6D, RPGR and, in cooperation with CLS1, to ATG16L1. Altogether, our data represent a major step forward in the field and reveal an unprecedented degree of complexity in the ciliary targeting mechanisms of INPP5E, as compared to other known ciliary cargoes, for which a single or at most two CLSs suffice to explain ciliary accumulation 1, [70][71][72][73] .…”
Section: Multiple Clss Target Inpp5e To Ciliamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Altogether, our data show that INPP5E ciliary targeting is a surprisingly complex process involving four different cis-acting sequences (CLS1-4), and multiple trans-acting factors (like PDE6D, RPGR, ARL13B, TULP3, CEP164 and ATG16L1). This level of complexity is unusual, especially when compared to other ciliary cargoes, whose targeting is more straightforward, typically involving a single CLS 1, [70][71][72][73] . The complexity and redundancy in INPP5E ciliary targeting suggest this is a very important process, subject to fine regulation.…”
Section: Multiple Clss Target Inpp5e To Ciliamentioning
Primary cilia are sensory membrane protrusions whose dysfunction causes diseases named ciliopathies. INPP5E is a ciliary phosphoinositide phosphatase mutated in ciliopathies like Joubert syndrome. INPP5E regulates numerous ciliary functions, such as cilium stability, trafficking, signaling, or exovesicle release. Despite its key ciliary roles, how INPP5E accumulates in cilia remains poorly understood. Herein, we show that INPP5E ciliary targeting requires its folded catalytic domain and is controlled by four ciliary localization signals (CLSs), the first two of which we newly discover: LLxPIR motif (CLS1), W383 (CLS2), FDRxLYL motif (CLS3) and CaaX box (CLS4). We answer two long-standing questions in the field. First, partial redundancy between CLS1 and CLS4 explains why CLS4 is dispensable for ciliary targeting. Second, the essential need for CLS2 on the catalytic domain surface clarifies why CLS3 and CLS4 are together insufficient for ciliary accumulation. Furthermore, we reveal that some Joubert syndrome mutations in INPP5E catalytic domain affect its ciliary targeting, and shed light on the mechanisms of action of each CLS. Thus, we find that CLS2 and CLS3 promote interaction with TULP3 and ARL13B, while downregulating CEP164 binding. On the other hand, CLS4 recruits PDE6D, RPGR and ARL13B, and cooperates with CLS1 in ATG16L1 binding. Lastly, we show INPP5E immune synapse targeting is CLS-independent. Altogether, we reveal unusual complexity in INPP5E ciliary targeting mechanisms, likely reflecting its multiple key roles in ciliary biology.
“…Several GPCRs, particularly the classes A, B and F types, are selectively localised to the cilia (McIntyre et al, 2016; Schou et al, 2015). Amongst them, the Rhodopsin, GPR161, HTR6 and Somatostatin receptor 3 (SSTR3) are targeted due to specific ciliary localisation sequences at the intracellular loops and the C‐terminal ends of these receptors (for review, see Barbeito & Garcia‐Gonzalo, 2021). Cholesterol binding modulates many GPCR functions (reviewed in Sarkar & Chattopadhyay, 2020).…”
Section: Role Of Lipids In Ciliary Receptor Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cilia‐dependent signalling repertoire includes some of the primary regulators of cell proliferation, such as the hedgehog (Hh), wingless (Wnt), G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and a variety of growth factor receptors active during development and in differentiated tissues (Wingfield et al, 2018). The ciliary localisation of GPCRs like the serotonin (HTR6) and somatostatin (SSTR3) receptors, the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily members like the polycystin (PC1/2) family, and cyclic nucleotide‐gated (CNG) channels also contribute to the physiological conditioning of the cell under different environmental situations (Barbeito & Garcia‐Gonzalo, 2021; Yanardag & Pugacheva, 2021). The growth, stability and resorption of cilia are strongly correlated with cell proliferation, homeostasis and function.…”
Cilium, a tiny microtubule‐based cellular appendage critical for cell signalling and physiology, displays a large variety of receptors. The composition and turnover of ciliary lipids and receptors determine cell behaviour. Due to the exclusion of ribosomal machinery and limited membrane area, a cilium needs adaptive logistics to actively reconstitute the lipid and receptor compositions during development and differentiation. How is this dynamicity generated? Here, we examine whether, along with the Intraflagellar‐Transport, targeted changes in sector‐wise lipid composition could control the receptor localisation and functions in the cilia. We discuss how an interplay between ciliary lipid composition, localised lipid modification, and receptor function could contribute to cilia growth and signalling. We argue that lipid modification at the cell‐cilium interface could generate an added thrust for a selective exchange of membrane lipids and the transmembrane and membrane‐associated proteins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.