2019
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.rev118.002806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones: Collaborators in protein remodeling

Abstract: Heat shock proteins 90 (Hsp90) and 70 (Hsp70) are two families of highly conserved ATP-dependent molecular chaperones that fold and remodel proteins. Both are important components of the cellular machinery involved in protein homeostasis and participate in nearly every cellular process. Although Hsp90 and Hsp70 each carry out some chaperone activities independently, they collaborate in other cellular remodeling reactions. In eukaryotes, both Hsp90 and Hsp70 function with numerous Hsp90 and Hsp70 co-chaperones.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
194
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
4
194
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The chaperone function may provide an important protein homeostasis mechanism, by stabilizing misfolded, aggregation-prone MHC-I species which form inside the cell (5,59) and are known to contribute to the onset of disease (60). This cellular function is often attributed to a class of generic chaperones known as holdases, which includes essential heat-shock proteins (61). Our deep mutagenesis data suggest that the TAPBPR holdase activity requires a minimally folded epitope on the MHC α 2 domain with a conserved disulfide ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chaperone function may provide an important protein homeostasis mechanism, by stabilizing misfolded, aggregation-prone MHC-I species which form inside the cell (5,59) and are known to contribute to the onset of disease (60). This cellular function is often attributed to a class of generic chaperones known as holdases, which includes essential heat-shock proteins (61). Our deep mutagenesis data suggest that the TAPBPR holdase activity requires a minimally folded epitope on the MHC α 2 domain with a conserved disulfide ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It binds RpoH, and gene htpG is in the rpoH regulon. The regular functional collaboration between HtpG and DnaK requires that the two chaperones directly interact (Genest et al ., ). Within the frame of the present work, we can predict that inhibiting ATPase activity would prevent recycling of the protein to its ground state and abolish its activity.…”
Section: An Open List Of Basic Cellular Maxwell's Demonsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hsp90 family members exhibit receptor/kinase signal transduction activities and are well-established ATP-dependent foldases that promote protein maturation and thermic tolerance by ensuring proper folding of client proteins (Khurana et al, 2018; Morán Luengo et al, 2019; Genest et al, 2019). In addition, however, Hsp90 family members also exhibit ‘holdase’ functions independent of ATP binding/hydrolysis that include structural or scaffolding roles (Genest et al, 2019; Hoter et al, 2018; Csermely et al, 1998). In this light, we were particularly intrigued by early EM studies through which Hsp90 was localized to the nucleolus and onto chromatin fibrils (Biggiogera et al, 1996; Ohtani et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we consider several possibilities regarding the mechanism through which HSP/C impact thermic-induced rDNA hypercondensation. Given the well-established role for HSP/C in stabilizing or refolding client proteins (Khurana et al, 2018; Morán Luengo et al, 2019; Genest et al, 2019), one plausible mode of action is through stabilization of an as yet undefined thermic-sensitive client protein required for rDNA hypercondensation. This client is unlikely to include cohesin or condensin, given that thermic stresses in HSP/C mutant cells result in increased rDNA axial loop lengths but not loss of either loop morphology (loops transitioning to puffs) or sister chromatid cohesion (one loop transitioning to two loops) (Shen and Skibbens, 2017a; Matos-Perdomo and Machín, 2018a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%