HrQoL in hair loss‐affected patients with alopecia areata, androgenetic alopecia and telogen effluvium: the role of personality traits and psychosocial anxiety

Abstract

Background Illness impact on HrQoL has been widely studied in hair loss‐affected patients, yet no study has addressed whether individual differences modulate HrQoL in patients with alopecia areata (AA), androgenetic alopecia (AGA) and telogen effluvium (TE). Objective To identify the personality dimensions most predictive of the impact of disease on HrQoL. Method A single‐site cross‐sectional study was carried out in the Dermatology Unit of Sant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital, Bologna between September 2016 and September 2017. The study included 143 patients (105 females, ages 18–60 years) diagnosed with AA (n = 27), AGA (n = 80) and TE (n = 36). Illness severity, alopecia type, age, gender, education and civil status were documented. Health‐related quality of life (HrQoL), personality traits, trait anxiety, emotional intelligence, social anxiety and social phobia were also measured. Results AA, AGA and TE groups differed significantly for illness severity with most severe patients falling in AA type. For HrQoL, Gender × Group interaction resulted significant with AGA females reporting a higher impact of hair loss on quality of life than males, while TE males were more impacted by hair loss than AA and AGA males. Lower scores were obtained by AGA females than males on emotional intelligence while no significant differences were evidenced on other groups. A significant Gender × Group interaction was also found for trait anxiety, social phobia and social anxiety: consistently, AGA females reported higher scores than AGA males in all three measures. Finally, discriminant analysis evidenced that anxiety‐related traits can contribute to reliably predict hair loss impact on HrQoL, regardless of illness severity and alopecia type. Conclusions We recommend that gender and individual differences in anxiety‐related dimensions be considered as key factors in gaining a deeper understanding of hair loss impact on quality of life as well as in reducing the burden of illness in alopecia‐affected patients.

Stigmatization caused by hair loss – a systematic literature review

“…For example, only in Turkey was more than one of the relevant studies conducted and published. In general, however, the results underscore the psychosocial burden that can be triggered by hair loss [4,9,33].…”

Changing trends in surgical hair restoration: Use of Google Trends and the ISHRS practice census survey

“…Hair loss will affect most men and women at some point during their lifetime, causing increased anxiety and decreased self‐esteem 1,2 . While there are many nonsurgical therapies available (eg, minoxidil, finasteride, thickening shampoos, and vitamins), the most effective can have adverse side effects, such as the case with finasteride and sexual dysfunction, and all must be used continuously for long‐term results.…”

Patient characteristics, expectations and willingness to pay for hair loss therapies: A survey of 1561 participants at a tertiary dermatological referral centre in Singapore

“…By embracing a diverse study population including those with mild and undiagnosed hair loss, we found a lower impact on QoL compared with other studies. 1,2,4,6 The strong racial component with Indians and South Asians (e.g. Pakistani, Sri Lankans) having worse QoL compared with Chinese and Malays highlights the cultural variation, with certain races placing more importance in the fullness of hair.…”