1987
DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRE 664, a new parenteral penem. I. Antibacterial activity in vitro.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also more active than broad-spectrum cephalosporins, except for isolates of Shigella sonnei, Proteus mirabilis, and Providencia alcalifaciens. This degree of activity is also improved over those of penems CGP-31608, FCE-22101, and HRE-664 reported in the literature (8,9,15,18). Like other penems (15), CP-65,207 shows high affinity for PBP 2 in cell-free studies with E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was also more active than broad-spectrum cephalosporins, except for isolates of Shigella sonnei, Proteus mirabilis, and Providencia alcalifaciens. This degree of activity is also improved over those of penems CGP-31608, FCE-22101, and HRE-664 reported in the literature (8,9,15,18). Like other penems (15), CP-65,207 shows high affinity for PBP 2 in cell-free studies with E. coli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This degree of activity is also improved over those of penems CGP-31608, FCE-22101, and HRE-664 reported in the literature (8,9,15,18). Like other penems (15), CP-65,207 shows high affinity for PBP 2 in cell-free studies with E. coli. This high affinity for PBPs, combined with its stability to hydrolysis by a wide variety of P-lactamases, may explain the high antibacterial activity of CP-65,207 against members of the Enterobacteriaceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At present, there is some confusion as to whether [I-lactamase inhibitors owe induc tion potency, thus resulting in a possible antagonism instead of the expected syner gism [7], It is evident that clavulanic acid as well as sulbactam exhibit induction po- Consequently, there is no close relation between the induction potency and a pos sible antagonism, presumably due to the formation of an enzymatically inactive complex which is stable for several hours [15]. A comment should be made on the new penem compound H RE 664 [ 18]. This agent is a by far less potent inducer as compared to the related compound Sch 34343, in spite of common structural fea tures and properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such compounds exhibit good antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative species, on the one hand, and stability to a variety of beta-lactamases, on the other (6,8,10,11). However, with the exception of the penem compound CGP 31608 (CIBA-GEIGY Corp., Summit, N.J.), they are not active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6,7,9,11). In this study the antibacterial effect of a new penem compound (HRE 664) was evaluated against clinical isolates; and the results were compared with those obtained with broad-spectrum penicillins, cephalosporins, and structurally related agents (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%