“…Only 11% of studies sought to provide explanation for HRM effects through consideration of mediators which included human capital, motivation, and employee voice (Shahzad, Arenius, Muller, Rasheed, & Bajwa, 2019), employee commitment (Lechuga Sancho et al, 2018), employee involvement and quit rates (Allen et al, 2013), employee creativity (Do & Shipton, 2019), strategic orientation (Teo et al, 2011), strategic flexibility and ambidexterity (Patel, Messersmith, & Lepak, 2013; Xiu et al, 2017), and organizational learning capability (Wan Hooi & Sing Ngui, 2014). Boundary conditions explored as moderators included sector (Hayton, 2003), demographic characteristics, HR practices, and employee outcomes (Chandler & McEvoy, 2000; Lai, Saridakis, & Johnstone, 2017; Lin, Chen, Huang, & Lu, 2014), philosophy and culture (Messersmith & Wales, 2011; Patel & Cardon, 2010; Triguero‐Sánchez, Peña‐Vinces, & Sánchez‐Apellániz, 2013), coupled with management features, for example the existence of an HR department (Chadwick & Li, 2018), formality (Lai, Saridakis, Blackburn, & Johnstone, 2016), and the nature of leadership (McClean & Collins, 2019). Some studies usefully analyzed data from extensive national databases, such as the Work Employment Relations Survey (Bacon & Hoque, 2005; Bryson & White, 2019).…”