2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/380571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPV11 Positive Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Endometrium with Signet-Ring Cells: Diagnostic Criteria and Review of the Literature

Abstract: The presence of signet-ring cells in an endometrial adenocarcinoma is extremely uncommon and it is always necessary to rule out a metastatic neoplasm. We report a FIGO grade 2 endometrial carcinoma with a signet-ring cell component found in the curettage performed to a 53-year-old woman. The neoplastic proliferation was also found in the endometrium of the radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The uterine neoplasm invaded less than one-half of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, PAX8 is a novel tumor marker whose positivity suggests a tumor origin in the epithelium of the Müllerian ducts rather than a gastroin-testinal or breast carcinoma [8]. In relation to CEA, a tumor marker associated mainly with tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, the cases published to date have not been consistent in their results, since three cases were CEA negative [1,4,6], while three others were CEA positives [3,5]. Therefore, this marker has a limited value both to confirm or to rule out a gastrointestinal origin of the primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, PAX8 is a novel tumor marker whose positivity suggests a tumor origin in the epithelium of the Müllerian ducts rather than a gastroin-testinal or breast carcinoma [8]. In relation to CEA, a tumor marker associated mainly with tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, the cases published to date have not been consistent in their results, since three cases were CEA negative [1,4,6], while three others were CEA positives [3,5]. Therefore, this marker has a limited value both to confirm or to rule out a gastrointestinal origin of the primary tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is also important to make a differential diagnosis between an endometrial or cervical origin of the tumor. The presence or absence of certain risk factors, the findings of the physical examination and imaging tests and the determination of the human papillomavirus (HPV) status will help established the diagnosis, as well as the IHC studies since the positivity of the hormonal receptors and vimentin, and the negativity of p16, together with the absence of HPV infection, suggest an endometrial origin of the lesion [1,4,5], while contrary results are associated with a cervical origin, as published by Giordano et al [9]Only the case published by Pusiol et al [6] had negative hormonal receptors and positive p16 as well as infection by HPV genotype 11, despite the endometrium being its primary origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This extremely rare case of an “endometrial adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells” with an interesting histopathological view is, to our knowledge, the sixth reported case in literature. The identification of a “primary endometrial adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells” requires ruling out metastatic tumours as well as identifying an endometrial origin with the histopathology and immunohistochemical characteristics [ 1 ]. Both of these steps are essential undertakings because the presence of a metastatic tumour presenting with a signet-ring cell positivity most probably notes a breast or a gastric primary tumour, an advanced stage disease, and a different therapeutical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of signet-ring cells in primary endometrial adenocarcinoma tumours is a rarely observed entity which has to our knowledge been reported in only 5 cases, previously [ 1 4 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%