2016
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1191257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPV-mediated inactivation of tumor suppressor p53

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further characterized the functional effects of alphapapillomaviruses in tumors by integrating external PCAWG datasets such as driver mutations, mutational signatures, structural variations, gene expression profiles and patient survival. In head and neck cancer, HPV-positive tumors exhibit an almost complete mutual exclusivity with mutations in known drivers like TP53, CDKN2A and TERT (q=1.73x10-5, q=1.73x10-5, q=0.012; multiple testing corrected for presented mutations and in EBV and HPV, DISCOVER 22 ) (Figure 3c), as reported previously 25 , which could be explained by a mutation independent inactivation of TP53 through the human papillomaviruses [28][29][30] . Analyzing the mutational signatures enriched in these cases, we identified mutational signatures 2 as enriched for alphapapillomavirus positive cases in head and neck cancers (q=0.02; FDR corrected Wilkoxon Rank Sum test; Figure 3d) 31 .…”
Section: Alphapapillomavirussupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We further characterized the functional effects of alphapapillomaviruses in tumors by integrating external PCAWG datasets such as driver mutations, mutational signatures, structural variations, gene expression profiles and patient survival. In head and neck cancer, HPV-positive tumors exhibit an almost complete mutual exclusivity with mutations in known drivers like TP53, CDKN2A and TERT (q=1.73x10-5, q=1.73x10-5, q=0.012; multiple testing corrected for presented mutations and in EBV and HPV, DISCOVER 22 ) (Figure 3c), as reported previously 25 , which could be explained by a mutation independent inactivation of TP53 through the human papillomaviruses [28][29][30] . Analyzing the mutational signatures enriched in these cases, we identified mutational signatures 2 as enriched for alphapapillomavirus positive cases in head and neck cancers (q=0.02; FDR corrected Wilkoxon Rank Sum test; Figure 3d) 31 .…”
Section: Alphapapillomavirussupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The ligation junctions (residues (15)(16) and (37-38), respectively) were chosen in the regions of the sequence that remain unstructured in the known complex with nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) of CBP, 2 therefore modification of Gln16 and Gln38 into pseudo-glutamines is unlikely to affect the properties of the synthetic TAD-p53.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Furthermore, cancer-inducing viruses can inactivate p53, for example, E6 protein of human papilloma virus (HPV) induces p53 degradation. 15 The protein p53 consists of five major domains, such as transactivation domain (TAD), proline-rich domain, DNA binding core domain, tetramerization domain and regulatory domain. 13 The N-terminal TAD is acidic, intrinsically disordered and responsible for binding to various transcription factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared with the control group, p53 protein accumulated mainly in the nuclei of cells treated with CDV or DDP, which was possibly caused by the decrease in E6 protein expression. This is assumed because analysis of other complex structures of the p53 core showed that the E6-binding surface of p53 was available for interaction not only in ‘free’ p53 tetramers but also in p53 molecules bound to DNA or other cellular proteins (10). These results were consistent with the findings of western blot analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%