How Workplace Gossip Shapes Interpersonal Relationships: A Qualitative Study from the Gossip Recipient’s Perspective

Abstract

Although preliminary research implies a tantalizing association between workplace gossip and interpersonal relationships, little is known about how gossip shapes relationships at work. Given that relationships are integral to employee wellbeing and to the development of social capital, it appears vital to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological processes linking gossip and workplace relationships. To this end, we induce theory from qualitative evidence regarding the processes whereby workplace gossip shapes relationships in the workplace. Taking the under-researched perspective of the gossip recipient, our study draws on multi-source data to explore how recipients’ experiences of gossip incidents affect their dyadic relationships with gossipers and gossip targets. We find that recipients’ interpretations of gossipers’ intentions—prosocial, self-serving, or genuine—initiate three distinct processes that engender a range of relational outcomes, from decreased trust to the development of close interpersonal connections. In describing these nuanced processes and their associated relational outcomes, we provide insights that extend and enrich theory and challenge conventional assumptions about workplace gossip.

Distributive Injustice and Work Disengagement in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry: Mediating Roles of the Workplace Negative Gossip and Organizational Cynicism

“…When employees perceive that their rewards and opportunities are determined arbitrarily or influenced by factors beyond their control, it diminishes their sense of autonomy and can lead to disengagement. Negative gossip serves as a means for employees to express their perceived lack of control and vent their frustrations, thereby reinforcing the belief that they have minimal influence over their work situation [95].…”

Riddle Me This: What Do Leader Green Behaviors, Inclusion, and Workplace Gossip Have in Common? They are GOM’s 2024 Best Papers!

“…This year’s three articles selected by GOM ’s editorial leadership for special recognition as the 2024 Best Quantitative Paper (Housten III et al, 2023), 2024 Best Qualitative Paper (Greenslade-Yeats et al, 2023), and the 2024 Best Conceptual Paper (Zacher et al, 2024) once more demonstrate GOM ’s ability and success in achieving our mission statement. Indeed, our 2024 Best Paper Award winners reflect GOM ’s openness to micro- and macro-research, conceptual and empirical articles, and both quantitative and qualitative methods.…”