SAE Technical Paper Series 2020
DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Well Can mPEMS Measure Gas Phase Motor Vehicle Exhaust Emissions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also in agreement with our recent review that summarized tests from different laboratories [34]. Other researchers found ±8% CO differences for a gasoline vehicle and 15% on average for a 6.7 L diesel vehicle [35]. For NO x the differences were ±15% (absolute emission levels were not reported).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also in agreement with our recent review that summarized tests from different laboratories [34]. Other researchers found ±8% CO differences for a gasoline vehicle and 15% on average for a 6.7 L diesel vehicle [35]. For NO x the differences were ±15% (absolute emission levels were not reported).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The measured variability of ±5 g/km translates into 3.5% for the 140 g/km CO 2 emission of this vehicle. Other researchers also found the agreement between PEMS and bags to be better than 5% [35,39]. This uncertainty is much lower than the 7.5-10% currently assumed for PEMS in the JRC assessment of the measurement uncertainty of PEMS [13,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Even for the PEMS equipment (used for the homologation process), it is an accepted possibility to calculate the exhaust gas flow from fuel or intake airflow instead of with a direct read with a flowmeter. This is because the results obtained have similar accuracy to values from flowmeters or pitot tubes [58,74,75].…”
Section: Appendix C Nox Mass Emission Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It should be noted that using the ECU signals for exhaust mass flow estimation is accepted by European Union (EU) regulation 3 concerning the emission testing procedure for light-duty vehicles. Vu et al 2 report excellent correlations between exhaust flows estimation from ECU sensors and high accuracy SAO measurements, concluding that this is a viable method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both engine test bench and portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) use CO 2 concentration analysers that are based on the non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) method. 2 Despite their high accuracy in steady state, they suffer from a slow time response (usually with a time constant between 2 and 5 s) and a delay that, depending on the length of the pipe connecting the exhaust with the analyser, can exceed 5–10 s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%