2001
DOI: 10.1186/2048-4623-1-s3-op035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How well are recent randomised controlled trials reported?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole study was devalued by complete lack of description of the means of randomisation . Although this may be seen as judging an old study by today's standards (Begg 1996), there is some evidence that quality of reporting was better in early mental health studies (Ahmed 1999) and that the CONSORT statement has made little di erence (Milton 2001).…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole study was devalued by complete lack of description of the means of randomisation . Although this may be seen as judging an old study by today's standards (Begg 1996), there is some evidence that quality of reporting was better in early mental health studies (Ahmed 1999) and that the CONSORT statement has made little di erence (Milton 2001).…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%