2003
DOI: 10.1080/02602930301681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Well Am I Doing? Using a Corpus-based Analysis to Investigate Tutor and Institutional Messages in Comment Sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some feedback practices seemed to be widespread in Anglophone academia, for example, the prevalence of written language in feedback. Findings are consistent with other studies that have identified written summative feedback as the predominant practice in academic contexts (Beaumont et al, 2011;Blair et al, 2014;Boud, 2007;Crisp, 2007;Gibbs and Simpson, 2004;Lillis, 2006 Randall andMirador, 2003;Sadler, 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some feedback practices seemed to be widespread in Anglophone academia, for example, the prevalence of written language in feedback. Findings are consistent with other studies that have identified written summative feedback as the predominant practice in academic contexts (Beaumont et al, 2011;Blair et al, 2014;Boud, 2007;Crisp, 2007;Gibbs and Simpson, 2004;Lillis, 2006 Randall andMirador, 2003;Sadler, 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hattie and Timperley, 2007;Hyland, 2009;McCune & Hounsell 2005;Orsmond & Merry, 2011;Poulos & Mahony, 2008;Prowse et al, 2007;Sadler, 2002Yorke, 2003. However, little evidence of student engagement with written summative feedback, the most common type found in this study, as well as limited evidence of the impact of this type of feedback on students' literacy practices, raise questions as to the effectiveness of written summative feedback, or feedout (Knight, 2002), which is also consistent with some of the literature (Beaumont et al, 2011;Blair et al,2014;Crisp, 2007;Randall and Mirador, 2003;Sadler, 1989).…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, formative feedback is delivered to encourage students to improve their performance in the future. Randall and Mirador (2003) have shown that summative feedback is considered as a single comment about the quality of the students' work, while formative feedback is expected to provide a comment which is developmental in nature. According to Shute (2008), the main purpose of formative feedback is to enhance students' knowledge, understanding, and skills in some content area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of tutor beliefs in relation to how tutors see their roles in the feedback process, ultimately deserves some attention. Randall & Mirador (2003) suggested that feedback showed signs of being framed within an institutional discourse. If it is indeed institutionally framed, an analysis of tutor language can reveal disciplinary practices possibly aimed at sensitising or socialising MA in Education students to conventions being observed, inevitably providing insights into the discourse community of educational studies, and its commenting practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%