2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How we hear what is hardly there: Mechanisms underlying compensation for /t/-reduction in speech comprehension

Abstract: In four experiments, we investigated how listeners compensate for reduced /t/ in Dutch. Mitterer and Ernestus [Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. (2006). Listeners recover /t/s that speakers lenite: evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 34, showed that listeners are biased to perceive a /t/ more easily after /s/ than after /n/, compensating for the tendency of speakers to reduce word-final /t/ after /s/ in spontaneous conversations. We tested the robustness of this phonological context effect in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A first step towards modelling the role of near phonetic context for spoken-word recognition was made in papers on place assimilation and deletion of segments (e.g., Gaskell, 2003;Gaskell & Snoeren, 2008;Gaskell & Marslen-Wilson, 1996, 1998Mitterer, Yoneyama, & Ernestus, 2008). Hawkins and Smith (2001), in their POLYSP model (for 'polysystemic speech understanding'), focus on the role of systematic fine phonetic detail that may be spread throughout the speech signal and how it facilitates analysis at all linguistic levels simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first step towards modelling the role of near phonetic context for spoken-word recognition was made in papers on place assimilation and deletion of segments (e.g., Gaskell, 2003;Gaskell & Snoeren, 2008;Gaskell & Marslen-Wilson, 1996, 1998Mitterer, Yoneyama, & Ernestus, 2008). Hawkins and Smith (2001), in their POLYSP model (for 'polysystemic speech understanding'), focus on the role of systematic fine phonetic detail that may be spread throughout the speech signal and how it facilitates analysis at all linguistic levels simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Mitterer, Yoneyama, & Ernestus, 2008), it is natural to wonder about the ecological validity of these results. The goal of Simulation 3 is to address this question by testing DiBS on a corpus of spontaneous adult speech containing natural pronunciation variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by previous results regarding compensatory effects in deletions (Mitterer & Ernestus, 2006;Mitterer et al, 2008;, a crucial factor of interest was the duration of preceding /s/. Next, due to the sequence of productions, the following context was restricted to the first segments /v/, /e /, and /s/ of the respective pronouns (see Material section).…”
Section: Factors Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite segment deletions in general and /t/ deletions in particular, listeners usually understand what speakers say and are assumed to compensate for imperfect realizations (Mitterer & Ernestus, 2006;Mitterer et al, 2008;. While this would suggest a rule-based (undoing) mechanism for /t/-deletion in natural speech, it is not completely regular in a traditional, rule-based phonological sense, because it does not occur in 100% of the cases (contrary to, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation