2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How We Can Improve the Quality of Care for Patients Requesting Medical Assistance in Dying: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Providers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of empirical evidence from the Canadian context post-MAID implementation provides insight into significant factors influencing early experiences. From a systems perspective, many were struggling to set up processes that ensured patient-centered care and accessibility [19], particularly in light of the limited numbers of assessors and providers available [20], and the heavy workloads on those who were willing and able to provide MAID services [21]. Accessibility to MAID was influenced by the sometime contentious relationship between those care providers involved in MAID and those in palliative care [19,22,23].…”
Section: Request Signed By One Independent Witnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A review of empirical evidence from the Canadian context post-MAID implementation provides insight into significant factors influencing early experiences. From a systems perspective, many were struggling to set up processes that ensured patient-centered care and accessibility [19], particularly in light of the limited numbers of assessors and providers available [20], and the heavy workloads on those who were willing and able to provide MAID services [21]. Accessibility to MAID was influenced by the sometime contentious relationship between those care providers involved in MAID and those in palliative care [19,22,23].…”
Section: Request Signed By One Independent Witnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accessibility to MAID was influenced by the sometime contentious relationship between those care providers involved in MAID and those in palliative care [19,22,23]. There was a need to support healthcare providers involved in MAID in light of the emotional impact [20,24,25] and a need to provide healthcare providers with the knowledge and skills to assist with, or to assess and provide, MAID, particularly in light of vague eligibility criteria [20,26,27]. There was also a need to manage the relational challenges that arose between those who saw MAID as an acceptable moral option and those who did not [19-21, 25, 26].…”
Section: Request Signed By One Independent Witnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These projected increases are substantiated as research from international regions with assisted dying reported an increase in the number of patients accessing care over time (Steck et al, 2013). Access to MAID varies throughout Canada (Brown et al, 2020;Oczkowski et al, 2020;Schiller, 2017). Individuals in rural and remote areas experience health care access challenges and poorer health outcomes (Greenburg et al, 2019), and so it is reasonable they will experience MAID access challenges as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, additional data are needed to evaluate and improve the service (eg, feedback from providers, patients and families, analyses of the process including its policy, functionality, efficiency, effectiveness, impacts and sustainability and so on). 24 Canadian providers and health systems are actively working to improve the MAID experiences of patients, families and professionals, [25][26][27][28] but it remains challenging to improve its implementation without knowing what the process looks like. Studies describing professional roles, expectations and knowledge gaps 9 15 29-32 or how MAID was implemented 4 5 9 33-37 provide few details about the process itself (eg, how work is coordinated between professionals, which professional(s) do which activities and when and so on).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%