How was France invaded? 170 years of colonisation of metropolitan France by freshwater mussels

Prié, Vincent

doi:10.1007/s10750-023-05274-8

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the recent review by Prié [26], the first arrival of D. polymorpha in France must be dated as 1852. However, some older authors, for example, Locard [70] and Fischer [71], gave an earlier date, 1838, when this species was found in the Nord Department (see also Andrusov [31] and Starobogatov and Andreeva [3]).…”

Section: The European Naturalists' Response To the D Polymorpha Invas...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…I mean a study of the museum collections and old literary sources that may help to discover the "invisible" steps of invasions and document them more accurately than molecular research analyzing a set of recently collected individuals. Instances of this approach are rarer [25,26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dates of the first records of Dreissena polymorpha in various countries of Western and Central Europe (1800-1920s). Compiled after several sources[2][3][4][5]26,31].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…* This information is given by Andrusov[31] and Starobogatov and Andreeva[4] only. Prié[26] does not mention this record. ** Andrusov[31] gives another date of the infiltration of D. polymorpha to Portugal-1880.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Not a Silent Invasion: The Reaction of European Naturalists to the Spread of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the 19th—Early 20th Century

Vinarski

2023

Diversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The case of naturalization of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771), in countries lying beyond its native Ponto–Caspian range is remarkable as one of the first instances when the scientific community as early as the mid-19th century was fully aware of the non-indigenous status of a particular species as well as of the need for the study and monitoring of this process. Based on a study of contemporary sources, I reconstruct the early response of European naturalists (including those who today would be called “citizen scientist”) to the invasion of Dreissena and describe their attitudes to the problem, including the divergence in opinion about the origin and the means of dispersal of this bivalve species. An analysis of papers published in English, French, German, and Russian between 1774 and 1920 showed that the invasion of D. polymorpha was by no means “silent”; quite the opposite, it provoked an immediate reaction from naturalists. The scientific agenda for the study of the new invader was proposed in England as early as 1838.

show abstract

Section: The European Naturalists' Response To the D Polymorpha Invas...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dates of the first records of Dreissena polymorpha in various countries of Western and Central Europe (1800-1920s). Compiled after several sources[2][3][4][5]26,31].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Not a Silent Invasion: The Reaction of European Naturalists to the Spread of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the 19th—Early 20th Century

Vinarski

2023

Diversity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Review of the globally invasive freshwater mussels in the genus Sinanodonta Modell, 1945

Douda,

Zieritz,

Vodáková

et al. 2024

Hydrobiologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review, we synthesize the current knowledge of the biology, ecology, and impact of Sinanodonta freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionidae), native to East Asia, that have successfully invaded Europe, Central America, North Africa, and several Asian regions. The main introduction pathways of Sinanodonta were reconstructed based on DNA sequence data and distribution records. We show that invasive lineages of Sinanodonta belong to three species, namely, S. woodiana s. str. (“temperate invasive” lineage), S. pacifica (“tropical invasive” lineage), and S. lauta. Their generalist fish-dispersed larvae, short life span, high fecundity, use by humans for multiple purposes, and ability to establish populations in anthropogenically disturbed conditions were identified as crucial traits driving their invasions. Information on the consequences is scarcer, but Sinanodonta can impact native species through larval parasitism, host fish/food competition, and parasite transmission. In addition, ecosystem effects through their filtration—biodeposition—excretion activity and the occurrence of massive die-offs were detected. Ecosystem services and disservices have not yet been quantified, even at local scales, and management methods in the invasive range are understudied. A better understanding of Sinanodonta ecology, impacts, and management options is urgently needed to make informed decisions and set realistic and impactful restoration goals.

show abstract

Conservation assessment based on large-scale monitoring of eDNA: Application to freshwater mussels

Prié

Danet

Valentini

et al. 2023

Biological Conservation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How was France invaded? 170 years of colonisation of metropolitan France by freshwater mussels

Cited by 4 publications

References 40 publications

Not a Silent Invasion: The Reaction of European Naturalists to the Spread of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the 19th—Early 20th Century

Not a Silent Invasion: The Reaction of European Naturalists to the Spread of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the 19th—Early 20th Century

Review of the globally invasive freshwater mussels in the genus Sinanodonta Modell, 1945

Conservation assessment based on large-scale monitoring of eDNA: Application to freshwater mussels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About