How Vulnerable Are American States to Wildfires? A Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment

Abstract

Quantifying livelihood vulnerability to wildland fires in the United States is challenging because of the need to systematically integrate multidimensional variables into its analysis. We aim to measure wildfire threats amongst humans and their physical and social environment by developing a framework to calculate the livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) for the top 14 American states most recently exposed to wildfires. The LVI is computed by assessing each state’s contributing factors (exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity) to wildfire events. These contributing factors are determined through a set of indicator variables that are categorized into corresponding groups to produce an LVI framework. The framework is validated by performing a principal component analysis (PCA), ensuring that each selected indicator variable corresponds to the correct contributing factor. Our results indicate that Arizona and New Mexico experience the greatest livelihood vulnerability. In contrast, California, Florida, and Texas experience the least livelihood vulnerability. While California has one of the highest exposures and sensitivity to wildfires, results indicate that it has a relatively high adaptive capacity, in comparison to the other states, suggesting it has measures in place to withstand these vulnerabilities. These results are critical to wildfire managers, government, policymakers, and research scientists for identifying and providing better resiliency and adaptation measures to support states that are most vulnerable to wildfires.

Contribution to the Study of Forest Fires in Semi-Arid Regions with the Use of Canadian Fire Weather Index Application in Greece

“…Fire danger rating systems incorporate methods and models for data gathering and processing to convert inputs into numerical qualitative ratings. These danger ratings are often ranked from low to extreme and are visually plotted on maps that are user friendly and easy to interpret [14]. Systems such as the FWI detect and assess weather favorability over fires and their potential intensity as well as spread rather than provide an estimate on the probability of occurrence itself and general fire behavior.…”

Cap. 28. Suroeste. En: La Quinta Evaluación Nacional del Clima

“…El efecto de los incendios en los medios de vida de las comunidades depende de la exposición al riesgo de incendios forestales y de la capacidad de adaptación (KM 7.3). El análisis de la vulnerabilidad de los medios de subsistencia en 14 estados propensos a los incendios reveló que los residentes de Nuevo México y Arizona eran los más vulnerables debido a una exposición al riesgo relativamente alta y a un acceso de bajo a moderado a los recursos necesarios para adaptarse a las condiciones cambiantes 336 . Las zonas de bajos ingresos, comunidades de color, migrantes indígenas indocumentados, minorías sexuales y de género (KM 15.2) 337 y las personas sin hogar son las más vulnerables a los impactos de los incendios forestales 231,338 , incluida la contaminación del agua por compuestos cancerígenos 269 .…”

The livelihood of farmers cultivating fire-prone peatlands: Keeping the ecology and economy sustainable

“…This vulnerability also occurs after fires, and suitable countermeasures require the systematic integration of multidimensional variables. The livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) can be used to measure the threat of fire disasters in physical and social environments (Baijnath-Rodino, Kumar, Rivera, Tran, & Banerjee, 2021). The sustainable livelihood framework presents the principal factors affecting people's livelihoods and the relationship between those factors.…”