How Valuable Is It?

Andersson, Henrik; Werkmäster, Jakob Green

doi:10.1007/s10790-020-09751-4

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Andersson and Werkmäster (2021) and Rabinowicz (2020) have recently advanced support for the approach that emphasizes the attitudinal component. For ease of presentation, we will assume that the attitudinal component of the FA analysis accounts for degrees of value.…”

Section: Part 2: the Fitting Attitudes Analysis Of Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…If the attitudinal component accounts for degrees of value, then the strength of the normative component can account for the degree of resilience. Andersson and Werkmäster (2021) and Rabinowicz (2020) have recently advanced support for the approach that emphasizes the attitudinal component. For ease of presentation, we will assume that the attitudinal component of the FA analysis accounts for degrees of value.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this reason, these objections will not be addressed in this article. 9 For more on this see Andersson and Werkmäster (2021). 10 A third possibility is that both components together determine degrees of value.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Normative Resilience

Andersson

Werkmäster

2022

Utilitas

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the phenomenon of normative resilience, with a focus on evaluative resilience. An object can become more or less valuable. In addition to this change in an object's value, the object's value can become more or less resilient. If it is less resilient, it cannot withstand as much evaluative change without its degree of value changing, as compared to an object with more resilient value. The article consists of three parts. First, examples of resilience are presented to give the reader an intuitive understanding of the phenomenon, Second, the Fitting Attitudes Analysis of value is invoked to provide a formal account of evaluative resilience. Third, the theoretical and practical advantages of acknowledging the existence of evaluative resilience are brought to light.

show abstract

Section: Part 2: the Fitting Attitudes Analysis Of Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Normative Resilience

Andersson

Werkmäster

2022

Utilitas

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Blame and Proportionality

Johansson Werkmäster,

Werkmäster

2024

Ethic Theory Moral Prac

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ethics of blame includes conditions determining whether an instance of blame is permissible. One generally recognised condition is that blame should be proportionate. If it is not proportionate, that speaks against its permissibility. All the same, what exactly amounts to proportionate blame is currently under-theorised. In this paper, we aim to amend this. More precisely, we distinguish between private and overt blame and highlight some of their differences – e.g., that they aggregate differently. Then, we develop an account of proportional blame and draw out some practical implications of our account.

show abstract

VIII—Situational Dependence and Blame’s Arrow

Isserow

2024

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A looming deadline. A difficult situation at home. A heated phone conversation that redirects our attention. Certain features of our circumstances can be (at least partially) excusing; sometimes, agents who act wrongly in the face of circumstantial pressures are not (that) blameworthy for having done so. But we’re rather bad at detecting these factors that excuse others from blame. When put together, these two observations yield an under-appreciated problem: we fall short of procedural norms of blame in fairly systematic ways.

show abstract

How Valuable Is It?

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Normative Resilience

Normative Resilience

Blame and Proportionality

VIII—Situational Dependence and Blame’s Arrow

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About