2017
DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2017.1397502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How usual is treatment as usual? Experienced therapists’ reflections on participation in practice-based research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so, we address the need to examine the effectiveness of psychodynamic treatment beyond the efficacy evidence offered by randomized clinical trials (RCTs; Fonagy, ), and we respond to calls for theory‐driven research on psychoanalytic therapies by testing a theoretical premise of CRP (Luyten, Blatt, & Mayes, ). Practice‐based research findings complement evidence from RCTs, offering a different perspective of change and greater external and ecological validity (Barkham, Stiles, Lambert, & Mellor‐Clark, ; Halvorson, Benum, Oddli, Stänicke, & McLeod, ). Identifying trajectories of change extends previous empirical findings documenting that (a) change varies among subgroups of clients over time (Owen et al, ) and (b) not every client experiences improvement (e.g., Frankfurt, Frazier, Syed, & Jung, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In doing so, we address the need to examine the effectiveness of psychodynamic treatment beyond the efficacy evidence offered by randomized clinical trials (RCTs; Fonagy, ), and we respond to calls for theory‐driven research on psychoanalytic therapies by testing a theoretical premise of CRP (Luyten, Blatt, & Mayes, ). Practice‐based research findings complement evidence from RCTs, offering a different perspective of change and greater external and ecological validity (Barkham, Stiles, Lambert, & Mellor‐Clark, ; Halvorson, Benum, Oddli, Stänicke, & McLeod, ). Identifying trajectories of change extends previous empirical findings documenting that (a) change varies among subgroups of clients over time (Owen et al, ) and (b) not every client experiences improvement (e.g., Frankfurt, Frazier, Syed, & Jung, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We used a practice-based research design, a supplement to efficacy research (e.g. randomised controlled trials), which offered the opportunity to examine the effectiveness of psychotherapy to promote growth in virtuousness in a real-world treatment context, with greater ecological and external validity (Halvorson et al, 2020;Henton, 2012). Specifically, we tested the theoretical premise that growth in the virtue of humility could facilitate changes in mental health symptoms and social well-being through decreased affect dysregulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giants Kraus, Miller, & Lambert, 2014;Shedler, 2006). Each group may consequently find it difficult to mentalize the assumptions and exigencies of the other (e.g., Halvorsen, Benum, Oddli, Stänicke, & McLeod, 2017;McWilliams, 2017). In the current research literature, some scholars have bemoaned "empirical imperialism" (Castonguay et al, 2015), in which academic researchers expect deference from clinicians but fail themselves to listen to their clinical colleagues.…”
Section: Feminist Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, both Wachtel (2016) and Orange (2003) emphasize the limitations of randomized-controlled studies, suggesting that the assumptions of their authors about the real-world clinical implementation of RCTs can be naïvely narrow; specifically, these investigators fail to appreciate the struggles and efforts of ordinary therapists with naturalistic samples of complex patients (see Shedler, 2018, for an even harsher critique). Halvorsen, et al (2017) note that "Several studies have suggested that research participation increased therapist interest in research and willingness to use research findings to inform their practice" (p. 4). Attention to research by clinicians is assumed to be valuable for practice.…”
Section: Feminist Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%