How useful is expert opinion for predicting the distribution of a species within and beyond the region of expertise? A case study using brush‐tailed rock‐wallabies Petrogale penicillata

Abstract

Summary1. Species' distribution modelling relies on adequate data sets to build reliable statistical models with high predictive ability. However, the money spent collecting empirical data might be better spent on management. A less expensive source of species' distribution information is expert opinion. This study evaluates expert knowledge and its source. In particular, we determine whether models built on expert knowledge apply over multiple regions or only within the region where the knowledge was derived. 2. The case study focuses on the distribution of the brush-tailed rock-wallaby Petrogale penicillata in eastern Australia. We brought together from two biogeographically different regions substantial and well-designed field data and knowledge from nine experts. We used a novel elicitation tool within a geographical information system to systematically collect expert opinions. The tool utilized an indirect approach to elicitation, asking experts simpler questions about observable rather than abstract quantities, with measures in place to identify uncertainty and offer feedback. Bayesian analysis was used to combine field data and expert knowledge in each region to determine: (i) how expert opinion affected models based on field data and (ii) how similar expert-informed models were within regions and across regions. 3. The elicitation tool effectively captured the experts' opinions and their uncertainties. Experts were comfortable with the map-based elicitation approach used, especially with graphical feedback. Experts tended to predict lower values of species occurrence compared with field data. 4. Across experts, consensus on effect sizes occurred for several habitat variables. Expert opinion generally influenced predictions from field data. However, south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales experts had different opinions on the influence of elevation and geology, with these differences attributable to geological differences between these regions. 5. Synthesis and applications. When formulated as priors in Bayesian analysis, expert opinion is useful for modifying or strengthening patterns exhibited by empirical data sets that are limited in size or scope. Nevertheless, the ability of an expert to extrapolate beyond their region of knowledge may be poor. Hence there is significant merit in obtaining information from local experts when compiling species' distribution models across several regions.

Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States

“…Use of expert opinion may therefore be an efficient path to an initial nationwide assessment of pollinator habitat and abundance in the absence of consistent data across different land categories. Such an approach must include careful treatment of uncertainty that may arise from differences in expertise among regions, authorities, taxa, and so on (34)(35)(36). Indeed, a robust analysis of uncertainty, and its implications for assessment findings, is a useful result in itself.…”

A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure

“…Expert opinion is increasingly being used in environmental decision-making where empirical data are either uncertain or unavailable (Kuhnert et al, 2010;Martin et al, 2012). Expert opinion has already been applied to a wide range of environmental problems, including spatial distribution modeling of declining species (Murray et al, 2009), assessment of climate change impacts (Morgan et al, 2001), and forestry management (Crome et al, 1996). For decommissioning decisions, independent experts in environmental aspects of oil structures could be asked to rank options according to their expected performance for each criterion, following consideration of site-specific information provided by the EIA.…”

Interaction between classification detail and prediction of community types: implications for predictive modelling of benthic biotopes

“…Species distribution models, along with their resulting habitat suitability maps, have been used to resolve questions in a wide range of arenas from conservation biology (e.g. Meynard et al 2009, Müller et al 2009, Murray et al 2009) to fundamental sciences such as biogeography (e.g. Hopkins & Burr 2009, Meissner & Darr 2009, Remm & Remm 2009, Titeux et al 2009), phylogeography (e.g.…”