How training can fix the existential crisis in science journalism

Abstract

Science Journalism has been through a huge transition period in the past two decades as digital outlets compete with print media ― and that transition is continuing. It's left many science journalists unsure of their place in this new ecosystem and unsure of how best to use the new tools they have been presented with, such as social media. Now is an important time for training in this sector to ensure that journalists ― and the publications they work for ― can find their place again. There is also a real need for training for new writers ― to bridge the gap between their degree and their first job as a journalist.

A Case Study of Indonesian Journalists’ Participation in a Cochran Fellowship Program focused on Biotechnology and Journalism

“…Thus, future programs similar to this should focus on teaching program participants how to translate science using specific communication mediums and tools in specific contexts. Journalists are critical components in the translation of science (Fahy & Nisbet, 2011;Houge, 2015;Ridgway, 2016;Treise & Weigold, 2002). However, without the skills and knowledge in translating science using specific communication mediums and tools, they cannot effectively disseminate information or change the public's perceptions of science.…”

“…Science communication has transitioned from a one-way communication platform to a two-way communication platform where everyone can disseminate scientific information-factual or not (Fahy & Nisbet, 2011). Yet, foundational to science journalism training is the ability to gather factual information and transform the information into compelling stories (Ridgway, 2016). In 2016, Ridgway argued the need for "short, sharp science writing training," which should include "how to find stories and how to shape them into clear, engaging and accurate content" as editors seek journalists who can write and "produce credible evidence" of their writing abilities (p. 3).…”