How to Study Well-Being: A Proposal for the Integration of Philosophy With Science

Abstract

There are presently two approaches to the study of well-being. Philosophers typically focus on normative theorizing, attempting to identify the things that are ultimately good for a person, while largely ignoring empirical research. The idea is that empirical attention cannot be directed to the right place without a rigorous theory. Meanwhile, social scientists typically focus on empirical research, attempting to identify the causes and consequences of well-being, while largely ignoring normative theorizing. The idea is that conceptual and theoretical clarity will come with time and more data. This article argues that neither is a good approach to the study of well-being. The traditional philosophical approach underappreciates the vital importance of empirical investigation, whereas the atheoretical empirical approach underappreciates the vital importance of normative theorizing. The proposed solution is to bring these methods together. Well-being research should be interdisciplinary. The article proposes a “conceptual engineering” approach as a novel alternative. This approach involves an iterative process of normative theorizing, empirical investigation, and conceptual revision, with the aim of articulating concepts and theories of well-being that optimally suit particular interests and purposes.

CIÊNCIA NA PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO: análise das disciplinas de metodologia de pesquisa e estatística

“…Trazendo para um exemplo mais recente, só foi possível observar um buraco negro no espaço-tempo porque primeiro havia uma teoria que dava sustentação a essa hipótese. Ou seja, o método é uma parte indissociável da ciência, assim como a imaginação e as proposições teóricas (PRINZING, 2021).…”