2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Set the Game Characteristics, Design the Instructional Content and the Didactical Setting for a Serious Game for Health Prevention in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost all the studies provided a more or less detailed description of the game: some studies limited the description to the task required to the players, while others provide more details about the objects of interaction and even a wider explanation of the graphic interface adopted [ 23 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Regarding game assessment, nearly half of the studies evaluated the games in terms of usability, playability, satisfaction and players’ propensity to adopt games as a new safety training method [ 23 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Other forms of evaluation included training effectiveness through game performance (based on scores and player’s ability to complete levels) [ 37 , 47 , 48 , 52 , 58 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ] or through the comparison between safety game training with traditional training (i.e., performed through lectures, videos and power-point presentations) [ 22 , 23 , 42 , 47 , 51 , 53 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Almost all the studies provided a more or less detailed description of the game: some studies limited the description to the task required to the players, while others provide more details about the objects of interaction and even a wider explanation of the graphic interface adopted [ 23 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Regarding game assessment, nearly half of the studies evaluated the games in terms of usability, playability, satisfaction and players’ propensity to adopt games as a new safety training method [ 23 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Other forms of evaluation included training effectiveness through game performance (based on scores and player’s ability to complete levels) [ 37 , 47 , 48 , 52 , 58 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ] or through the comparison between safety game training with traditional training (i.e., performed through lectures, videos and power-point presentations) [ 22 , 23 , 42 , 47 , 51 , 53 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies involving novice users, the sample size ranged from 8 to 280 participants, while in studies with expert users, the sample ranged from 3 to 200 participants. Moreover, both novice workers and experts were involved when investigating safety in industrial sectors, mining, firefighters and maritime sector; in addition, experts and workers who hold managerial positions were considered in the aviation and restaurant business [ 56 , 57 , 68 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations