2016
DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.64.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Select Change Agents in Organizations? A Comparison of the Classical and Network Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection Of Change Agent. According to Zbieg, Zak, and Batorski (2016), there are two types of classical change agent selections: i) Top-down management, and ii) random selection. Basically, both approaches to change agent selections were using formal structure.…”
Section: Organization Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Selection Of Change Agent. According to Zbieg, Zak, and Batorski (2016), there are two types of classical change agent selections: i) Top-down management, and ii) random selection. Basically, both approaches to change agent selections were using formal structure.…”
Section: Organization Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That gives them the ability to quickly receive and transmit information (Monge and Contractor, 2003). In consequence, their voices tend to be heard by many others, and they tend to know most of the information flowing "through the Disney (2020) and Zbieg, Zak, and Batorski (2016) In short, these centrality measures indicate the different functions of each central person or the change agent. If the organization wanted to connect diverse groups in the organization, they can select a person with high betweenness centrality to execute the task.…”
Section: How To Use Themmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These rules provide roles for the agents in the self-organization process which hence provide a robust enhancement schemes to the agents' network. In [13], they proposed a theoretical method to optimize the agents network. Their idea is to minimising the number of agents who are chosen to be in charge in organisations and increasing their connections to acquire network coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pracownicy znajdujący się na wyższych szczeblach w strukturze formalnej są często uważani za właściwe osoby, aby pełnić rolę liderów [Jacobs, Russ-Eft, 2001]. Podejście to posiada wady, gdyż nie bierze pod uwagę istnienia nieformalnych połączeń pomiędzy pracownikami [Zbieg, Batorski, Żak, 2016]. Badania pokazują, iż ludzie korzystają głównie z doświadczeń zaczerpniętych od innych pracowników, które płyną przeważnie poprzez sieci nieformalne [Cross, Paise, Weiss, 2007].…”
unclassified