2016
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to report results of prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times

Abstract: Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are the most widely used tests to investigate coagulation abnormalities. Varied result reporting have been introduced over the years for the two tests, thus making their interpretation rather confusing in different clinical settings. PT results have been reported as clotting time, percentage activity, PT-ratio (patient-tonormal clotting time) and as international normalized ratio (INR). The INR scale has been devised to harmonize results st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the PT and aPTT thresholds most commonly identified as indicating concern (13 to 20 seconds and 30 to 45 seconds, respectively), were consistent with reference ranges (typically 10 to 12 seconds for PT and 24 to 37 seconds for aPTT),20,21 although reference ranges are known to be variable and depend on the laboratory performing the test, due in part to variability in the reagents, analyzer instruments, and calibration. Outliers regarding PT thresholds included the German cohort, half of whom selected a higher range of 21 to 40 seconds as cause for concern, and the French cohort, the greatest percentage (40%) of whom identified a very high threshold of ≥50 seconds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Overall, the PT and aPTT thresholds most commonly identified as indicating concern (13 to 20 seconds and 30 to 45 seconds, respectively), were consistent with reference ranges (typically 10 to 12 seconds for PT and 24 to 37 seconds for aPTT),20,21 although reference ranges are known to be variable and depend on the laboratory performing the test, due in part to variability in the reagents, analyzer instruments, and calibration. Outliers regarding PT thresholds included the German cohort, half of whom selected a higher range of 21 to 40 seconds as cause for concern, and the French cohort, the greatest percentage (40%) of whom identified a very high threshold of ≥50 seconds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This percentage is intuitive property and is based on the observation that normal pooled plasma possess 100 % PT activity and is taken as 100 and further on dilution, the clotting time as well as % activity goes on decreasing and a calibration curve was plotted between percentage activity vs. clotting times. The % PT activity of the samples was evaluated from the same calibration curve 33 . All the experiments were performed at 37˚C and in triplicate batches.…”
Section: Plasma Clottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different concentrations were chosen according to the minimum and maximum amount of sample required for i.v bolus administration 32,44 . The pathway of blood coagulation includes intrinsic and extrinsic pathways which quote for APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) and PT (Prothrombin time) respectively 33 . Although APTT and PT were reported as clotting time (sec.)…”
Section: Evaluation Of Haemocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The PT, originally developed by Quick in 1935, 17 is a firstline clotting test based on simultaneous recalcification of citrated plasma and activation of the extrinsic/TF pathway of blood coagulation (i.e., FVII) by using recombinant thromboplastin preparations which mimic the effect of TF. 18 This test is therefore mostly sensitive to defects of FVII and other factors of the common pathway of blood coagulation (i.e., FX, prothrombin, and Fbg) (►Fig. 1).…”
Section: First-line Coagulations Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%