How to report educational videos in robotic surgery: an international multidisciplinary consensus statement

Celentano, Valerio; Smart, Neil; McGrath, John; Ra, Chisei; Spinelli, Antonino; Challacombe, Ben; Belyansky, Igor; Hasegawa, Hirotoshi; Munikrishnan, Venkatesh; Pellino, Gianluca; Ahmed, Jamil; Muysoms, Filip; Saklani, Avanish; Khan, Jim; Popowich, Daniel A.; Ballecer, Conrad; Coleman, Mark

doi:10.1007/s13304-020-00734-5

Cited by 17 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(39 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…), selected initial propositions based on personal experience, video guidelines of major journals, and a literature review. 3,5,10,[12][13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A Delphi questionnaire was created, and the propositions were reviewed online by the entire consensus committee in three rounds. Blinded feedback was shared among respondents between each round, and the respondents were able to suggest new propositions at the end of round 1.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5,11,[13][14][15][16] Guidelines are available for other specialties, such as general surgery, to help improve the quality of the videos, but none are available in otorhinolaryngology. 17,18 Our specialty is well suited to the creation of surgical videos, particularly when using endoscopes or microscopes in otology, rhinology, or laryngology, as first-person surgical films are readily available. Also, the great variety of specificities within each subspecialty should be taken into account during video editing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Educational surgery videos that are available online are too often of insufficient quality and are rarely peer reviewed 5,11,13–16 . Guidelines are available for other specialties, such as general surgery, to help improve the quality of the videos, but none are available in otorhinolaryngology 17,18 . Our specialty is well suited to the creation of surgical videos, particularly when using endoscopes or microscopes in otology, rhinology, or laryngology, as first‐person surgical films are readily available.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives/Hypothesis: Otolaryngology instructional videos available online are often of poor quality. The objective of this article was to establish international consensus recommendations for the production of educational surgical videos in otolaryngology. Study Design: DELPHI survey. Methods: Twenty-seven international respondents participated in this study from 12 countries. Consensus was reached after three rounds of questionnaires following the Delphi methodology. The proposals having reached the 80% agreement threshold in the third round were retained. Results: The main recommendations are as follows: 1) Ethics: patients must be anonymized and unrecognizable (apart from plastic surgery if necessary). A signed authorization must be obtained if the person is recognizable. 2) Technical aspects: videos should be edited and in high-definition (HD) quality if possible. Narration or subtitles and didactic illustrations are recommended. 3) Case presentation: name of pathology and procedure must be specified; the case should be presented with relevant workup. 4) Surgery: surgical procedures should be divided into several distinct stages and include tips and pitfalls. Pathology should be shown if relevant. Key points should be detailed at the end of the procedure. 5) Organ-specific: type of approach and bilateral audiometry should be specified in otology. Coronal plane computed tomography scans should be shown in endonasal surgery. It is recommended to show pre-and postoperative videos in voice surgery and preoperative drawings and photos of scars in plastic surgery, as well as the ventilation method in airway surgery.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Guidelines for producing laparoscopic and robotic surgery videos for surgical education have been previously established and can be used by programs to uphold quality standards of the educational content. 37 , 38 …”

Section: Video-based Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The lasting footprint of COVID-19 on surgical education: A resident and attending perspective on the global pandemic

Imai

Soukiasian

Truong

et al. 2021

The American Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted surgical training nationwide. Our former curricula will likely not return, and training will need to adapt, so we are able to graduate residents of the same caliber as prior to the pandemic. Methods A survey evaluating perceptions of changes made in surgical training was conducted on surgery residents and attendings. Results Disaster medicine training has become more relevant and 85% residents and 75% attendings agreed it should be incorporated into the curriculum. Safety of family was the most significant concern of residents. Virtual curriculum was perceived to be acceptable by 82% residents and only 22% attendings (p < 0.01). Residents (37%) were less concerned than attendings (61%) of falling behind on their overall training (p = 0.04). Both groups agreed operative skills would be adversely affected (56%vs72%; p = 0.37). Conclusions To maintain an effective surgical curriculum, programs will need to implement new educational components to better prepare residents to become surgeons of the future.

show abstract

“…We treated an 82‐year‐old woman who was diagnosed with synchronous right colon adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma of the lower pole of the right kidney. A robotic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis and a partial right nephrectomy (a nephron‐sparing procedure indicated in T1a‐b renal cell carcinomas < 7 cm, as in the present case) were performed [6,7].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotic right hemicolectomy and partial nephrectomy for synchronous malignancies – a video vignette

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multiple abdominal and perineal approaches have been described for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse. There has been no consensus on the optimal approach, with randomized controlled trials and metaanalysis failing to show superiority of any particular approach [1,2]. Recently, use of the laparoscopic abdominal approach has increased, although this technique may not be suitable for all patients [3]. The Delorme's procedure is useful for treating rectal prolapse in elderly patients with significant comorbidities, patients at high risk for general anaesthesia and patients with recurrence after an abdominal procedure [4,5]. We describe the steps of the procedure in a 65-yearold man with a recurrent rectal prolapse (Video S1). The procedure can be performed under general or spinal anaesthesia, with the patient in the lithotomy position. Use of a headlight is advisable. The prolapse is reproduced to assess the length of mucosectomy required (double the length of the prolapse). After application of a Lone Star retractor (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, CT, USA), the dentate line is visualized and the mucosa marked circumferentially 2 cm proximally. The submucosa is infiltrated with a saline/ adrenaline solution (1:100 000) and incised circumferentially. A mucosal sleeve is developed, with care being taken not to buttonhole the mucosa or the muscle. This is followed by plication of the muscle with 2-0 or 3-0 Polydioxanone and mucosal approximation with 3-0 polygalactin. Our patient made an uneventful recovery and was recurrence-free 10 months after the procedure. The Delorme's procedure can be a valuable tool for treating a select group of patients with rectal prolapse. A stepwise approach helps to standardize the procedure and reduces intra-operative complications and postoperative morbidity.

show abstract

How to report educational videos in robotic surgery: an international multidisciplinary consensus statement

Cited by 17 publications

References 39 publications

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

IVORY Guidelines (Instructional Videos in Otorhinolaryngology by YO‐IFOS): A Consensus on Surgical Videos in Ear, Nose, and Throat

The lasting footprint of COVID-19 on surgical education: A resident and attending perspective on the global pandemic

Robotic right hemicolectomy and partial nephrectomy for synchronous malignancies – a video vignette

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About