2019
DOI: 10.5201/ipol.2019.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Reduce Anomaly Detection in Images to Anomaly Detection in Noise

Abstract: Anomaly detectors address the difficult problem of detecting automatically exceptions in a background image, that can be as diverse as a fabric or a mammography. Detection methods have been proposed by the thousands because each problem requires a different background model. By analyzing the existing approaches, we show that the problem can be reduced to detecting anomalies in residual images (extracted from the target image) in which noise and anomalies prevail. Hence, the general and impossible background mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, the a contrario approach is based on the same principle, but differs from the others in the sense that it allows to derive detection thresholds by estimating and controlling the expected number of occurrences of an event under the background model. An excellent example is the work by Ehret et al [15], in which they eliminate the self-similarity of the image by averaging the most frequent patches using Non Local Means [28] , and perform a detection using the NFA score over the residual image, which is formed by noise and anomalies. In this way, the general background modeling problem gets reduced to a noise modeling problem, making the algorithm to work with any kind of background.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, the a contrario approach is based on the same principle, but differs from the others in the sense that it allows to derive detection thresholds by estimating and controlling the expected number of occurrences of an event under the background model. An excellent example is the work by Ehret et al [15], in which they eliminate the self-similarity of the image by averaging the most frequent patches using Non Local Means [28] , and perform a detection using the NFA score over the residual image, which is formed by noise and anomalies. In this way, the general background modeling problem gets reduced to a noise modeling problem, making the algorithm to work with any kind of background.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, what we need to evaluate is the probability of that arrangement being generated by the background model. Another characteristic that makes the a contrario framework different and particularly useful, is that it automatically fixes detection thresholds that control the number of false alarms (NFA) [3], [15], [25], [26], allowing not only to detect rare events in very diverse backgrounds but also to associate a rareness score. This score has a clear statistical meaning: it is an estimate of the number of occurrences of an observed event if it was produced by the background model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been compared with the ones achieved using a Residual Image Algorithm that compares a newly acquired image with a saved reference, similar to the method in [88]. For this algorithm, the Evaluator that has been used follows the same rules of the one used for the BBS-ESN, and it is summarized in Figure 10.…”
Section: Comparison With Residual Image Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the a contrario approach is based on the same principle, but differs from the others in the sense that it allows to derive detection thresholds by estimating and controlling the expected number of occurrences of an event under the background model. An excellent example is the work by Ehret et al [15], in which they eliminate the self-similarity of the image by averaging the most frequent patches using Non Local Means, and perform a detection using the NFA score over the residual image, which is formed by noise and anomalies. In this way, the general background modeling problem gets reduced to a noise modeling problem, making the algorithm to work with any kind of background.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%