2017
DOI: 10.1111/epi.13814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to record high‐frequency oscillations in epilepsy: A practical guideline

Abstract: High-frequency oscillations are promising new biomarkers in epilepsy. This review provides interested researchers and clinicians with a review of current state of the art of recording and identification and potential challenges to clinical translation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
160
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
160
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual analysis, however, entails serious obstacles making HFO assessment impossible for clinical routine; visual marking of HFOs is very time-consuming, requires expertise, and might be subjective if an interrater agreement is not sought. To overcome these drawbacks, various detectors were developed and validated over recent years (for more details, see Zijlmans et al 3 ). Automated and visual detection of HFOs yield comparable identification of the SOZ 93 ; a meta-analysis showed that removal of automatically detected HFOs and visually detected HFOs in presurgical data yield similar results with respect to good surgical outcome.…”
Section: Visual Versus Automatic Detection Of Hfosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual analysis, however, entails serious obstacles making HFO assessment impossible for clinical routine; visual marking of HFOs is very time-consuming, requires expertise, and might be subjective if an interrater agreement is not sought. To overcome these drawbacks, various detectors were developed and validated over recent years (for more details, see Zijlmans et al 3 ). Automated and visual detection of HFOs yield comparable identification of the SOZ 93 ; a meta-analysis showed that removal of automatically detected HFOs and visually detected HFOs in presurgical data yield similar results with respect to good surgical outcome.…”
Section: Visual Versus Automatic Detection Of Hfosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 HFOs are subdivided into ripples ranging from 80 to 250 Hz and fast ripples > 250 Hz. 2 For more details on the definition of HFOs, see the accompanying article in this issue by Zijlmans et al 3 on how to record HFOs. The first large application of HFOs was in the context of epilepsy surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, on data from human epilepsy patients this detector not only showed the results on par or better compared to the results of others [2,18,19] but its performance on tEEG data was directly compared to performance on simultaneously recorded conventional EEG data once again confirming the advantage of TCREs over conventional disc electrodes [11]. Recording HFOs with scalp EEG is very difficult [20] but we recently showed on data from animal model [12] and human patients with epilepsy [1] that they can be recorded with tEEG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The importance of this study stemmed from the fact that, unlike tEEG, EEG via conventional disc electrodes is limited in its ability to record HFOs from the scalp to ripples only [20].…”
Section: Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the development of several automated HFOs detectors (Fig. 1) from different laboratories, tuned to particular datasets and HFOs definitions, recently reviewed by Zijlmans et al, [24]. …”
Section: Hfos Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%