2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2362.00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Promote Growth in the Euro Area: The Contribution of Monetary Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 See for evidence on real wage rigidity for instance Calmfors (2001) and Boeri et al (2001). Issing (2000) considers the evidence for nominal wage rigidity convincing. See also, for instance, Knoppik and Dittmar (2002) for an analysis of downward nominal wage rigidity in Germany by a variety of approaches.…”
Section: Rigidities and Adjustment Dynamics: Overheating And Overcoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 See for evidence on real wage rigidity for instance Calmfors (2001) and Boeri et al (2001). Issing (2000) considers the evidence for nominal wage rigidity convincing. See also, for instance, Knoppik and Dittmar (2002) for an analysis of downward nominal wage rigidity in Germany by a variety of approaches.…”
Section: Rigidities and Adjustment Dynamics: Overheating And Overcoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Due to this simple finding, central banks should pay close attention to the development of the money supply. 9 The relationship between money and output, however, belongs to one of the most disputed questions in macroeconomics (see Issing, 2000). There is only one consensus: In the long run no trade-off between inflation and unemployment exists (see Parkin, 1998).…”
Section: The Role Of Money and Its Leading Indicator Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are discussed in more detail inIssing (2000b). For example, if labour supply is allowed to be endogenously determined, this means that changes in money growth have the potential to affect the relative marginal utilities of consumption and leisure and therefore the level of steadystate output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%