1986
DOI: 10.1177/0256090919860103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Price a Share for Acquisition

Abstract: Although take‐overs are becoming important means of diversification, there is no established technique which incorporates uncertainties involved and gives a range of values of a target firm which can form the basis for offering a price. Using a model of the firm's cash flows after acquisition, Malay Kanti Roy simulates the likely cash flow streams from the acquisition of India Cements for various values of the key variables such as growth rate and earnings before interest and taxes. He shows how such models a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various methods suggested by Western authors including: Tobin's q model (Tobin, 1969); diverse valuation models and results (Damodaran, 1996(Damodaran, , 2002Fernandez, 2002Fernandez, , 2003Fernandez, , 2007, assessment of valuation models (Levin and Olsson, 2000;Plenborg, 2002;Bailey et al, 2008); value relevance of accounting information (EI Shamy and Kayed, 2005;Misund et al, 2008), and estimating free cash flows (Velez-Pareja and Tham, 2010). Exclusive studies are: valuation of shares through simulation (Roy, 1986); valuation model for international acquisitions (Madura et al, 1991), valuation of hotels, property, and real estate (Hattersley, 1990;Graaskamp, 1992;Roubi, 2004), common errors in valuation (Fernandez and Bilan, 2007), psychology driven pricing in mergers (Baker et al, 2009), valuation of young companies (Zwilling, 2009), and comparison of NAV and NRR approach 1.0 (Nangia et al, 2011). Relevant studies include: relationship between corporate governance, board size, and valuation (Yermack, 1996;Bai et al, 2004); industrial diversification and firm value (Wilcox et al, 2001;Lin and Su, 2008); effect of cultural differences on firm value (Antia et al, 2007); impact of value drivers on firm value (Kazlauskienė and Christauskas, 2008), and the economic impact of mergers on firm value (Ma et al, 2011).…”
Section: Review Of Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are various methods suggested by Western authors including: Tobin's q model (Tobin, 1969); diverse valuation models and results (Damodaran, 1996(Damodaran, , 2002Fernandez, 2002Fernandez, , 2003Fernandez, , 2007, assessment of valuation models (Levin and Olsson, 2000;Plenborg, 2002;Bailey et al, 2008); value relevance of accounting information (EI Shamy and Kayed, 2005;Misund et al, 2008), and estimating free cash flows (Velez-Pareja and Tham, 2010). Exclusive studies are: valuation of shares through simulation (Roy, 1986); valuation model for international acquisitions (Madura et al, 1991), valuation of hotels, property, and real estate (Hattersley, 1990;Graaskamp, 1992;Roubi, 2004), common errors in valuation (Fernandez and Bilan, 2007), psychology driven pricing in mergers (Baker et al, 2009), valuation of young companies (Zwilling, 2009), and comparison of NAV and NRR approach 1.0 (Nangia et al, 2011). Relevant studies include: relationship between corporate governance, board size, and valuation (Yermack, 1996;Bai et al, 2004); industrial diversification and firm value (Wilcox et al, 2001;Lin and Su, 2008); effect of cultural differences on firm value (Antia et al, 2007); impact of value drivers on firm value (Kazlauskienė and Christauskas, 2008), and the economic impact of mergers on firm value (Ma et al, 2011).…”
Section: Review Of Existing Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in an early study in India, Roy (1986) computed share price for acquisition by using an illustrious operations research technique "simulation" with respect to ITC -India Cements takeover. Results proved that estimating minimum and maximum tender offer price is possible through a simulation process.…”
Section: Business Valuation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation