The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6406-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Predict Disorder in a Protein of Interest

Abstract: Currently available computational tools, which are many, provide a researcher with the multitude of options for prediction of intrinsic disorder in a protein of interest and for finding at least some of its disorder-based functions. This chapter provides a highly subjective guideline on how not to be lost in the "dark forest" of available tools for the analysis of intrinsic disorder. By no means it gives a unique pathway through this forest, but simply presents some of the tools the author uses in his everyday… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Per‐residue disorder content was evaluated by PONDR predictors, including PONDR‐FIT (Xue et al , 2010 ) and PONDR‐VSL2 (Peng et al , 2005 ). The intrinsic disorder propensities of TSN were evaluated according to the previously described method (Santamaria et al , 2017 ; Uversky, 2017 ). Disorder evaluations together with disorder‐related functional information were retrieved from the D 2 P 2 database ( http://d2p2.pro/ ) (Oates et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per‐residue disorder content was evaluated by PONDR predictors, including PONDR‐FIT (Xue et al , 2010 ) and PONDR‐VSL2 (Peng et al , 2005 ). The intrinsic disorder propensities of TSN were evaluated according to the previously described method (Santamaria et al , 2017 ; Uversky, 2017 ). Disorder evaluations together with disorder‐related functional information were retrieved from the D 2 P 2 database ( http://d2p2.pro/ ) (Oates et al , 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the method described by Uversky et al (2017) [ 102 , 103 ], the intrinsic disorder propensities of target proteins were evaluated using four algorithms from the PONDR family (PONDR-FIT, PONDR ® VSL2, PONDR ® VL3 and PONDR ® VLXT) [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], as well as IUPred-long and IUPred-short [ 41 ]. The mean intrinsic disorder value of each protein was calculated by averaging the disorder profiles of the above six predictors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, proteins with IDRs (intrinsically disordered regions) cannot form stable secondary structures and many IDRs contain a small biased amino acid composition which is referred to as low complexity domains (LCDs) (Das et al, 2014;. IDRs have been shown to be prone to aggregation upon stress conditions (Uversky, 2017).…”
Section: Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%