2014
DOI: 10.1177/1477878513517344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to pay for public education

Abstract: For years now, public education, and especially public higher education, has been under attack. Funding has been drastically reduced, fees increased, and the seemingly irresistible political force of ever-tightening austerity budgets threatens to cut it even more. But I am not going to take the standard line that government financial support for public higher education should be increased. I view that battle as already lost. What I am going to propose is that we stop arguing about the allocation or reallocatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further cuts to base funding have been announced since (ABCNews 2013, The Australian 2014). Similar reductions have been documented for the UK Higher Education (HE) sector (Reiff 2014) prompting one author to proclaim the academic role as 'one of the most stressful professions in Britain' (Paton 2013, p. 16). Evaluations of work stress in Australia (Boyd et al 2011) and the UK (Kinman & Jones 2008) identified increasing demands on experienced academics' time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Further cuts to base funding have been announced since (ABCNews 2013, The Australian 2014). Similar reductions have been documented for the UK Higher Education (HE) sector (Reiff 2014) prompting one author to proclaim the academic role as 'one of the most stressful professions in Britain' (Paton 2013, p. 16). Evaluations of work stress in Australia (Boyd et al 2011) and the UK (Kinman & Jones 2008) identified increasing demands on experienced academics' time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…146ff.). For a discussion of student debt, see also Martin 2015; for an alternative proposal, see Reiff 2014. make the most exploitative forms of lending superfluous, as individuals would no longer have to go into debt to satisfy basic needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…146ff.). For a discussion of student debt, see also Martin ; for an alternative proposal, see Reiff .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. For a provative proposal that might avoid such conditions see Reiff (2014) in this journal 13. For example, a relational egalitarian approach might be helpful in understanding the extent to which and ways in which 'payback' ought not be grounded in notions of charity or beneficence but in terms of a civic obligation or duty.…”
Section: Higher Education and 'Payback'mentioning
confidence: 99%