2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2006.00216.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Measure a Growing Hemangioma and Assess Response to Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, infantile haemangiomas have been difficult to quantitatively assess because of their irregularity, variable elevation [3], and propensity to be located on contoured regions such as the head and neck [13]. Because of these factors, traditional physical measures are often inaccurate and can vary markedly between assessors and even between the same assessors over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, infantile haemangiomas have been difficult to quantitatively assess because of their irregularity, variable elevation [3], and propensity to be located on contoured regions such as the head and neck [13]. Because of these factors, traditional physical measures are often inaccurate and can vary markedly between assessors and even between the same assessors over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the irregular, three-dimensional nature of these lesions, simple clinical measures utilising rulers and callipers can at best provide an estimate of volume [3]. In contrast, imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) can provide extremely precise measures of volume but are limited by expense, radiation exposure [4] and the need for infants to remain entirely still (often necessitating sedation) to perform these studies [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemispheric measurement is a bedside method to calculate the size of the IH using the following equation: (½) V=0.07 m 3 , where m is the average of the maximum length and maximum width of the lesion [20]. Photographs and dimensions of the IHs were taken at each visit.…”
Section: Follow-up and Endpoints Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response to therapy was measured by (1) blinded predicted volume estimation 25 at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and (2) blinded scoring of clinical photographs at 0, 12, and 24 weeks. For volume estimation, 2 measurements of the IH hemispheric diameter were taken 90°apart and the estimated hemispheric volume was calculated by the formula 0.07 3 m 3 where m is the mean of the 2 hemispheric measurements.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For volume estimation, 2 measurements of the IH hemispheric diameter were taken 90°apart and the estimated hemispheric volume was calculated by the formula 0.07 3 m 3 where m is the mean of the 2 hemispheric measurements. 25 The photographs at 0, 12, and 24 weeks were scored by 1 blinded investigator as 0 if no redness was observable, 1 if the lesion was ∼50% red, or 2 if the lesion was completely red.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%