How to Make the Mix Matter: A Case Study of Post-Transformational Leadership in Hybrid Public Management

Aagaard, Peter

doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1072211

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They had a limited scope and only considered the evaluation and impact of hybridization on social and environmental performance. These papers are (Aagaard, 2016;Abdul-Aziz, 2012;Barry et al, 2006b;Collings et al, 2008;Garrone et al, 2013;Goldoff, 2000;Greve & Andersen, 2001;Harhoff & Mayrhofer, 2010;Kirkpatrick et al, 2016;Kleynjans & Hudon, 2016;Klijn & Teisman, 2003;Lockwood & Davidson, 2010;Meyer & Hammerschmid, 2006;Rehn, 2008;Skelcher & Smith, 2017;Torchia & Calabrò, 2018). Note that there are no papers that included a mixed focus.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The consequent activities that emerge are the commercialization of public sector services and the need to monitor efficiency and effectiveness through the measurement of results and performance (Hodge & Greve, 2007;Skelcher & Smith, 2017). In this overview of hybrid changes has certainly changed the Public Management, in fact Garrone et al (2013) and Aagaard (2016) study the phenomenon of the change in the organizational culture of the public sector to look more like the private sector "for profit".…”

Section: Hybrid Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Secinaro¹,

Corvo²,

Brescia³

et al. 2019

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to systematically review literature concerning hybrid structures, that is, structures that are used to implement various forms of management. More specifically, the authors aim to answer two questions: can the evolution of hybrid organizations be analyzed and mapped, and if so, what are the factors that govern their development? The document is based on a systematic review approach of Little et al. (2009), which aims to make the selection of literature and the review process transparent and replicable following steps, eliminating the problem of prejudice to ensure objectivity of the research and credibility in the results as demonstrated by Rosenthal (1979) and Cooper (2003). What emerges from the literature of hybrid organizations seen from the point of view of NPM, the concept of Paradox, PPPs and Hybrid Impact is very interesting because by tidying up the concepts that various scholars have found it is possible to define what have been the factors that influenced the evolution of hybrid organizations giving a historical definition and helping to understand the roots of the concept and specifically where these new entities will generate impact. Several documents have analyzed the contribution of these approaches to the improvement of Management, Decision-Making, Identity Work, Governance, Hybrid Laws, Microfinance Institutions MFIs and Corporatizing. Through this research the authors hope to contribute to the academic and professional community by summarizing the known literature and suggesting paths for further research precisely because it is necessary the cooperation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hybrid Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Secinaro¹,

Corvo²,

Brescia³

et al. 2019

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Managing the ABC

Small

2021

Strangling Aunty: Perilous Times for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The hybridization movement reflects the shift and convergence of market-focused corporations on the one hand and social oriented organizations on the other towards more integrated value-creating hybrid arrangements. Hybridity is usually defined as the combination of two different and usually contradicting institutional logics. However, the hybridity literature is incongruent, inconsistent and seemingly addressing different spheres of hybridity, rendering the institutional construct ineffective for empirical analysis between organizations of varied natures. The purpose of this study is to arrive at a conceptualization of hybridity from an institutional perspective that allows for empirical analysis and comparison of the hybrid nature of organizations across time and contexts. Adopting a taxonomical approach based on the societal triangle, a systematic review (n = 109) is conducted to identify characteristics, issues and challenges of eight archetypical hybrid and non-hybrid organizations. Consequently, the authors propose a thematic mapping of relevant issues into five clustered themes. This thematic map can be helpful in guiding the analysis of and comparison between a broad range of different hybrid organizations. This study adds to the existing definitional and terminological debate in the hybridity literature by shifting the focus from a typological classification towards a taxonomical approach of hybridity.

show abstract

How to Make the Mix Matter: A Case Study of Post-Transformational Leadership in Hybrid Public Management

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Managing the ABC

Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About