How to Make Local Context Matter in National Advice: Towards Adaptive Comanagement in Norwegian Climate Adaptation

Abstract

Drawing on case studies in 12 Norwegian municipalities, this paper investigates how local context matters for developing national climate adaptation policies that are applicable at the municipal level. Moreover, it explicates which factors constitute this context and how these factors vary across the case municipalities. National climate adaptation policy in Norway can currently be characterized as top down, providing standardized requirements and advice to municipalities. However, Norwegian municipalities vary greatly with respect to physical conditions, organizational resources, and societal needs. They are autonomous to a great extent and are almost solely responsible for developing climate policy and planning within their own territories. Therefore, municipalities adapt national policies to their own context, reflecting local physiographic, organizational, and resource challenges, but these local translations are not fully recognized by national and sectoral actors. This paper underscores that the significant variation in contextual factors between municipalities is not sufficiently addressed and understood by national and sectoral governmental authorities. With the identified variation of the contextual factors across the case municipalities, an adaptive comanagement strategy within a multilevel governance system is suggested as a suitable framework to ensure a proactive approach to local adaptation, that is, mutual understanding and better cooperation between the national and local levels.

Urban contractual agreements as an adaptive governance strategy: under what conditions do they work in multi-level cooperation?

“…However, adaptive governance may also be enacted in more formal frameworks, allowing for flexibility to the local context and over time (Chaffin et al, 2014;Sharma-Wallace et al, 2018;Westskog et al, 2017).…”

‘Road of life’: changing navigation seasons and the adaptation of island communities in the Russian Arctic

“…Limits and barriers fall into five broad and interrelated categories: (1) motivation and the perceived need to adapt, which reflect both the agency and capacity of actors; (2) available and relevant knowledge about the change that requires adaptation; (3) lack of resources and trade-offs in municipalities; (4) unclear responsibilities and insufficient frameworks, which are related to the gap between the transferability of national policy goals and guidelines that do not meet local concerns (e.g. Westskog et al, 2017), and (5) inclusion of local and traditional knowledge, the absence of which is highly likely to create barriers and lose opportunities.…”

Avenues of understanding: mapping the intersecting barriers to adaptation in Namibia

“…It is for this reason that Westskog, Hovelsrud, and Sundqvist (2017) argue for the importance of understanding diverse local contexts and making these matter at the national planning scale, and similarly why Roberts (2008) emphasizes the need to ensure that adaptation agendas are 'rooted in local realities' (p. 521).…”