How to make a deal: the role of rankings and personal ties in creating trust in the mergers and acquisitions market

Abstract

On the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market, buyers and sellers resort to experts in order to secure deals. But as these experts might be prone to opportunism, firms need to find a way to build trust. We identify two trust devices: social ties and public rankings. We explore whether these personal and impersonal devices are substitutes, independent or complementary. We study the French M&A market through a mixed-method approach. We show that both previous contacts and league table rankings of firms contribute to trust and to making deals. These trust devices are all the more likely to be used if the deal is risky, especially within the sell side (more at risk). We also find that firms tend to make deals only with other firms at the same level in the rankings. Finally, we find some evidence of substitution between rankings and personal ties, especially for low-value deals.

Construcción social de la economía en organizaciones de la industria de servicios financieros en Chile y el Reino Unido

“…La pertenencia a los grupos y el acceso, por lo tanto, a negocios e información está fuertemente mediado por la capacidad que tienen las firmas de tener miembros integrados a los grupos o circuitos que estructuran sus mercados de interés. Ello sobre todo porque muchos de los servicios financieros dicen relación con asesorías, intermediaciones y otras operaciones que suponen un esfuerzo directo de las firmas por acceder a los grupos y segmentos donde se toman ese tipo de decisiones, así como también, a los grupos capaces de participar en este tipo de transacciones (Ho 2009;Boussard et al 2019). El origen de los contactos y las transacciones se da en los ámbitos más diversos de la vida humana (fiestas, reuniones familiares, clubes, etc.)…”

Executive Pay: Board Reciprocity Counts

“…While this assumption could still remain questionable, the length of our period enables us to limit the bias due to the introduction of lag-dependent variables. Logistic regressions, used similarly in previous studies [Rider 2012; Boussard, Godechot and Woloszko 2019], offer a great deal of flexibility, unlike SAOM (also known as SIENA) and TERGM models [Snijders, van de Bunt and Steglich 2010; Cranmer and Desmarais 2011], while also providing the advantage of handling much larger datasets.…”